Intellectual Property Rights

Arbitrability, Australia, Australian Arbitration Week, Competition Law, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, science, WIPO

, (Corrs Chambers Westgarth)/ /Leave a comment

On 10 October 2023, Corrs Chambers Westgarth hosted a panel discussion on the topic of “The next new variant? Arbitration in the healthcare and life sciences sector” as part of Australian Arbitration Week. The panel was moderated by Cara North of Corrs Chambers Westgarth and comprised: The Honourable Dr Annabelle Bennett AC SC, retired judge…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Asia, Asia-Pacific, Institutional Arbitration, Institutional Rules, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, International arbitration, KCAB, Korea, South Korea

, (Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB))/ /Leave a comment
KCAB International

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in IP cross-border disputes, including in non-traditional sectors. The Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (“KCAB”), which is the sole arbitral institution in Korea that is statutorily authorized to settle disputes under the Korean Arbitration Act, has experienced a gradual increase in IP-related cases. This article aims to…

California, California International Arbitration Week, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Patent, Patents

(Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law) and (Pepperdine Caruso School of Law)/ /Leave a comment

As part of the second annual California International Arbitration Week, KCAB and LimNexus hosted an expert panel on the arbitration of international patent disputes. This post presents some highlights from the panel. The panel was moderated by Steve Kim who currently serves as Secretary-General of KCAB International and included as speakers Conna Weiner (Arbitrator &…

Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Patent, Patents, WIPO

, (Labgold Law)/ /Leave a comment

As noted in GAR’s Guide to IP Arbitration, “one of the noticeable trends in international arbitration in the past several years has been the growing use of arbitration to resolve IP-related disputes.”  The World Intellectual Property Organization (“WIPO”) Arbitration and Mediation Center reports that its filings (arbitration, mediation and expert determination) increased by over 15%…

Arbitrability, India, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights

/ /Leave a comment
Young ICCA

Introduction The juxtaposition of laws that seemingly operate in different domains has posed a continual challenge to arbitration – conventionally, in the form of concerns over arbitrability of disputes. Here, arbitrability connotes the notion that a dispute, by its nature, is capable of being adjudicated beyond public fora, through a private tribunal chosen by parties….

Arbitrability, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, WIPO, WIPO Arbitration Rules

(Schoenherr) and / /Leave a comment
Schoenherr

The relevance of intellectual property in business is on the rise, in particular concerning cross-border transactions. Accordingly, the willingness to defend such rights is also becoming stronger. Disputes concerning intellectual property rights are traditionally mainly dealt with before national courts. Yet, in recent years there has been a considerable shift towards arbitration. The acknowledgement that…

Fair and Equitable Treatment, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment law, Investment protection, Investor, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS

/ /Leave a comment

In the first part of this article, we discussed the problems of balancing an investor’s intellectual property rights with the sovereign right of a State. Now, we look at how Philip Morris v Uruguay has added to the debate. In 2010 Philip Morris challenged two measures adopted by the government of Uruguay: (1) a “single…

Fair and Equitable Treatment, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Investment Arbitration, Investment law, Investment protection, Investor, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS

/ /Leave a comment

The constructive framework of ISDS was intended to promote investment and growth through the establishment of a stable and predictable atmosphere for investment. However, some have argued that this purpose has been warped to allow a small group of private individuals to rule on public matters. Arbitrations such as CMS v Argentina, Tecmed v Mexico,…

Arbitration, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights

(Gary Benton Arbitration)/ /1 Comment

A recently released study on technology sector dispute resolution highlights significant distinctions in the sector’s perceptions of US domestic and international arbitration. The study conducted by the Silicon Valley Arbitration & Mediation Center (SVAMC), a non-profit educational foundation based in Palo Alto, California, was directed to understanding technology sector views regarding litigation and arbitration. The…

CIETAC, HKIAC, HKIAC Rules, Hong Kong, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Third party funding

(Fangda Partners)/ /Leave a comment
HK45

As Hong Kong enters the year of the Rooster, its arbitration community can look back on a year of the Monkey in which the territory’s institutions and authorities implemented a number of initiatives aimed to promote arbitration, and its courts rendered several pro-arbitration decisions. Third party funding for arbitration in Hong Kong In November 2016,…

Arbitration, ECJ, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights

(JAMS International)/ /Leave a comment

As discussed in an earlier post, the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed that its function is not to review findings of an Arbitrator or his interpretation of a Patent License Agreement: Genentech, Inc. v Hoechst GmbH/ Sanofi Aventis GmbH, Case C-567/14 (Judgment of the Court: 7 July,2016). 1. The Facts The terms…

Arbitration, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Unified Patent Court

(JAMS)/ /3 Comments

Arbitration of patent disputes in the United States is on the rise. While, perhaps, somewhat behind the U.S. in that respect, the evidence is that this pattern is being paralleled in Europe. Indeed, there is reason to believe that the volume has already significantly increased over the past few years and is likely to increase…

Arbitration, Arbitration Act, CJEU, Intellectual Property Rights, Portugal

(Linklaters LLP)/ /Leave a comment

It is fair to say that arbitration is already a widespread dispute mechanism in Portugal, broadly used not only for commercial disputes but also for disputes in other areas such as, for example, consumer, administrative and tax disputes. As for intellectual property, the possibility of submitting disputes to arbitration has been a reality in Portugal…

Arbitration, China, Intellectual Property Rights

(AnJie Law Firm)/ /1 Comment

and Meng Li, AnJie Law Firm For the last ten years, whether an arbitration clause such as “any disputes arising from, or in connection with, the execution of this agreement shall be resolved by arbitration” may be applied to an infringement claim has been a topic of heated discussion among the legal practitioners in China….

Intellectual Property Rights, International Law, Investment Arbitration

(Notre Dame Law School)/ /1 Comment

I would like to continue the theme of the emerging convergence of investment arbitration and international trade. In my previous posts (see here and here) I discussed the prospect of using trade remedies to enforce investment arbitration awards. Another key example of convergence addresses the emerging trend of relying on investment arbitration to enforce international…

Anti-arbitration, Anti-suit injunction, Domestic law, Intellectual Property Rights, Parallel Proceedings

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

In a judgment dated 10 May 2013 (Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Genentech, Inc., Appeal No 2012-1454) the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the ‘CAFC’) affirmed a first-instance decision refusing the grant of an injunction preventing Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH (‘Sanofi’) from continuing to participate in an ICC arbitration where issues of infringement…