…remarks delivered by the Honorable Philip Jeyaretnam, President of the Singapore International Commercial Court.   Keynote: “Arbitration: Here, There and Everywhere” Claudia Salomon’s keynote address, titled “Arbitration: Here, There and…

…explore whether the expert determination should be complemented with mediation, in light of the Singapore Convention on Mediation. While the idea gained general support, there were concerns that the inclusion…

…third upload contains 17 decisions from 13 countries, all applying the New York Convention. The following is a selection of the upload’s highlights. In Compañía de Inversiones Mercantiles, the district…

…York Convention provides a crucial advantage. In respect of both arbitrator expertise and cross-border enforceability, data protection disputes are comparable to patent or trademark infringement cases. Both these intellectual property…

…issues for mediators under the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (“Singapore Convention”). The panel was moderated by Ivana Ninčić Österle, Executive Director of the International…

…PCA, under a domestic lex arbitri and enforced through the NY Convention. There is not one single legal characteristic that sets commercial and investment arbitration apart. Like childhood and adulthood,…

…relief is a final, enforceable award under the New York Convention, so as not to leave to a judge’s discretion whether such relief is enforceable should enforcement be necessary. Conclusion…

…(“BITs”) and the 1966 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (“ICSID Convention” or “Convention”). In August 2021, Ecuador rejoined the ICSID Convention….

…New York Convention. This specific reservation limits the Convention’s applicability in the PRC to disputes arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, that are considered “commercial” under Chinese…

…Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) In AsiaPhos v. China, the Tribunal found that it had no jurisdiction over Claimants’ allegations, ruling that: (i) the China-Singapore BIT limited arbitral…