the Taking of Evidence in 1999 which were further updated in 2010 (theIBA Rules”) to offer guidance for arbitral tribunals when dealing with evidentiary issues. The IBA Rules have…

…of rules relating to the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters within the Member States’ territory. Arbitration has always been excluded, not only from the scope…

…that opting for the expedited procedure under SIAC Rules 2010 is indicative of the intention of the parties to accept the SIAC Rules in its entirety and not just one…

…achievements and/or underestimated female performance. • In evaluating male and female professors, reviewers were four times more likely to ask for supporting evidence about the woman’s qualifications than they were…

…of institutional rules of International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”), Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC”) or London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”). Unwarranted judicial intervention and under-developed dispute resolution infrastructure and…

…advocated for a case-by-case approach in relation to admissibility of hacked information and documents as evidence in arbitration, taking us through various jurisprudential approaches in relation to this threshold question…

…refusal to enforce the award. 3. Lack of documentary evidenceevidence is often seized or destroyed and access to project areas is limited or restricted. Risks involve parties being…

…Division unless it is necessary for the resolution of the real issues in dispute in the proceedings.” Reference to “evidence” in this practice note means all evidence– claim, reply and…