European Convention on Human Rights

CJEU, Energy Charter Treaty, European Convention on Human Rights, Investment, Paris Court of Appeal, Set aside an arbitral award, Stay of Proceedings, United States Courts

(ICC International Court of Arbitration) and , (Mayer Brown)/ /Leave a comment

On 10 January 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal (“Paris CoA”) set aside the 50+ million USD UNCITRAL award rendered in the dispute between Komstroy (before Energoalians LLC, and now Stileks Scientific and Production Firm LLC (“Stileks”)) and the Republic of Moldova. The referring court applied the ruling rendered by the Court of Justice of…

European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Investment Arbitration, Investment Disputes, Public Interest

(City University of Hong Kong/ UMBRA Strategic Legal Solutions)/ /Leave a comment

On 30 November 2022, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (along with the British Institute of International and Comparative Law) organised the 2022 Kaplan Lecture. The lecture was delivered by Robert Spano – a former President and Judge of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) – and focussed on the new frontiers faced by…

Achmea, Enforcement, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights

(Twenty Essex) and (Fietta LLP)/ /1 Comment

On 30 June 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR” or “the Court”) delivered its judgment in BTS Holding, a.s. v. Slovakia (“BTS”), a case concerning the non-enforcement in Slovakia of a Paris-seated ICC commercial arbitration award.  Although there is nothing particularly ground-breaking in the Court’s key findings, the judgment has caught the attention…

CAS arbitration, Court of Arbitration for Sport, double hatting, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Independence and Impartiality

, (Lévy Kaufmann-Kohler)/ /Leave a comment

On 8 June 2021, the Paris Court of appeal (CoA) rendered an interesting decision dealing with the issue of so-called “double hatting” in sports arbitration. The issue of double hatting can no longer arise with respect to proceedings before the Lausanne-based Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as Article S18(3) of the Code of Sports-related…

Arbitrators, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Independence and Impartiality, International arbitration

(Twenty Essex)/ /Leave a comment

The relationship between commercial arbitration and European human rights law raises a number of conceptually difficult issues. How can the State be regarded as responsible at all for conduct of private arbitral proceedings? And how does the concept of an independent and impartial tribunal apply to a decision-making body appointed by the parties themselves? The…

Arbitrators, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Independence and Impartiality, International arbitration

(Twenty Essex)/ /Leave a comment

In the wake of BEG (see Part I), what conclusions can we draw about the place of arbitral independence and impartiality in the ECtHR’s Article 6 jurisprudence?   State Responsibility and Private Arbitral Proceedings Is a contracting State now in principle answerable under the Convention for the conduct of all private arbitral proceedings taking place…

Achmea, Corporate Social Responsibility, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, ISDS, Third party funding

/ /Leave a comment

What does the future hold for investment protection in Europe? A colossal question that resonates across board rooms and government halls on both sides of the Channel. With a consortium of investment law experts including Nikos Lavranos (NL Investment Consulting), Ayse Lowe (Bench Walk), Gordon Nardell QC (Twenty Essex), and Laura Rees-Evans (Fietta LLP) joining…

CAS arbitration, Enforcement, European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights, Swiss Private International Law Act, Switzerland

, , (Pestalozzi)/ /Leave a comment

Among its over 50 decisions on appeals against arbitral awards rendered in 2020, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) in two decisions yet again addressed a delicate issue on the interaction of human rights and arbitration: can private parties challenge arbitral awards on the basis that the arbitral tribunal violated their human rights under…

Achmea, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, ICSID, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Investment Arbitration

(delegaltessen) and (Stampa Abogados)/ /Leave a comment

The aftermath of Achmea Since the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Achmea, defending EU Member States and the European Commission have questioned the validity of the application of the investment arbitration clause in the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) to intra-EU disputes. Although the motions to challenge jurisdiction on…

Arbitrability, Brussels Regulation, Europe, European Convention on Human Rights, France, Russia, Unilateral Clauses

(New York University )/ /Leave a comment

A unilateral option clause (“UOC”) can take many forms. It may grant its beneficiary the exclusive right to choose between litigation and arbitration when a dispute arises, or to choose to litigate before a specific jurisdiction, while constraining the non-beneficiary to a specific forum or a specific mode of dispute settlement. Consequently, UOCs are undoubtedly…

Achmea, CJEU, European Convention on Human Rights, European Union

(NL-Investmentconsulting)/ /4 Comments

The Achmea judgment, passed on the 6th of March 2018, and addressed in the Kluwer blog posts available here and here, prompted us to think about what could be the way forward for an effective investment and investor protection within the EU. Now that the CJEU decided that investment treaty arbitration based on intra-EU BITs…

Arbitral Award, Arbitration Agreements, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Switzerland

(Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd, Switzerland) and (Schellenberg Wittmer )/ /Leave a comment
Schellenberg Wittmer

On 1 March 2016, the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR” or the “Court”) rendered a decision in the case of Tabbane v. Switzerland (application no. 41069/12). In that decision, which was published on 24 March 2016, the Court, for the first time, examined the compatibility of a waiver of recourse against an arbitral award…