Achmea, CJEU, Energy Charter Treaty, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Sweden

(Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /Leave a comment

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in Komstroy (C-741/19, Sept, 2021) that the dispute resolution mechanism of the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) does not apply in intra-EU investment disputes. The ruling was interpreted by some as the beginning of the end of intra-EU investment arbitration. A recent decision by the…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, BIT, Frivolous Claims, Investment Arbitration, Reform, Security for Costs, UNCITRAL WG III Series, Working Group III

, (Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /Leave a comment

Ahead of the thirty-ninth session of UNCITRAL Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform), the General Assembly Secretariat issued a note on issues to be considered on the topic of security for costs and frivolous claims. Averting frivolous claims has been a recurring topic in the ISDS debate over the past years, not least in…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, Costs, Costs in arbitral proceedings, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Sweden, Third party funding

, , (Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /Leave a comment

Introduction Despite a rapid emergence at a global stage, third-party funding (TPF) appears yet as unfamiliar to businesses in the Nordic region. According to a survey included in the 2018 edition of the Roschier Disputes Index, merely 5 per cent of the Nordic companies have used TPF for financing litigation or enforcement proceedings. Arguably, these…

Due process, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration, Provisional measures, Sovereign Immunity

(Durham Law School) and (Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /Leave a comment

Introduction Pursuant to Article 47 of the ICSID Convention, an ICSID Tribunal may “recommend any provisional measures which should be taken to preserve the rights of either party”. The use of “recommend” is concerning. Its lack of imperative character triggers a debate on whether ICSID provisional measures have legally binding effect, i.e. require mandatory state…

Arbitration, Execution, ISDS, State Immunity

(Durham Law School), (Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.), and (Stockholm University)/ /Leave a comment

Introduction This short note briefly touches upon two enforcement issues pertaining to third-party funding in international arbitration, one more ventilated than the other. It is hoped that our comments on these issues will be perceived as an insightful contribution to an already ignited debate, with the caveat that we provide for a discussion rather than…

Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Third party funding

(Durham Law School) and (Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /1 Comment

Third-party funding remains a hot topic in arbitration, which is understandable considering its complexity and that its accompanying issues often have major implications for arbitral procedure. This fall, the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on third-party funding in international arbitration released its “draft,” touching upon a number of contemporary issues vis-á-vis third-party funding, all of which…