BIT, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Regime Interaction, Regime Interaction in Investment Arbitration, Sustainability

(Durham Law School), , and (The Australian National University)/ /1 Comment

Debates about the fragmentation of international law and the sometimes conflicting relationship between a state’s and investor’s obligations under international investment law (“IIL”), on the one hand, and public international law and domestic law, on the other, have gained renewed relevance for investment arbitration. Issues related to the interactions between these regimes have featured in…

2021 in Review, ICSID Amendments, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS Reform, ITA, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL WG III Series, UNCITRAL WG3 Series

and (The Australian National University)/ /Leave a comment

The year 2021 has been perhaps the most controversial year for investment arbitration. From the profound structural reform work with respect to the ICSID and UNCITRAL rules, through the complete ban and termination of intra-EU investment arbitration in the European Union, to the ECT modernization process, this year has been marked by change and reform…

Arbitration Proceedings, Australia, Australian Arbitration Week, Court Proceedings, Functus Officio

(The Australian National University)/ /Leave a comment

On the final day of ACICA’s Australian Arbitration Week 2021, Level Twenty Seven Chambers presented a seminar on “Functus Officio in Arbitration”. The theme of the seminar was judicial intervention and functus officio, discussed by Shane Doyle QC (Barrister, Level Twenty Seven Chambers), Sarah Spottiswood (Barrister, Level Twenty Seven Chambers), and Chiann Bao (Arbitrator, Arbitration…

2020 In Review, Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, BIT, Institutional Rules, Investment Arbitration

(The Australian National University)/ /Leave a comment

In 2019, we were wondering whether winter had come to Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), bringing with it a decline in the negotiation and conclusion of bilateral investment treaties. Looking back on 2020, we are left asking ourselves a similar question. This post will examine the year’s major institutional developments and their effects on ISDS both…

Investment Arbitration, ISDS, Space Arbitration, Territory

(The Australian National University)/ /Leave a comment

Ever looked up at the night sky and wondered…what is the regulatory and dispute settlement regime that governs commercial activities out there? Well, it might be about time you did. This post celebrates October’s World Space Week by looking at the developments in the legal framework regulating commercial space activities and how the investor-state dispute…

Australian Arbitration Week, International Commercial Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Reform, Treaty drafting

and (The Australian National University)/ /1 Comment

On 14 October 2020, Professor Zachary Douglas QC delivered the 19th annual Clayton Utz and University of Sydney International Arbitration Lecture as part of Australian Arbitration Week. This year’s topic was a response to Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s (DFAT) review of its bilateral investment treaties (BITs). This blog post provides an overview…