Arbitration Institutions and Rules

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Early Determination, Early Dismissal, Expedited arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL WG II Series, Working Group II

(University of Oslo)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

Introducing a regulation of early determination in the context of expedited proceedings, highlights a series conflicting interests. Therefore, the UNCITRAL Working Group II on dispute resolution has not yet taken a final position on whether such a regulation should be inserted in the context of expedited arbitration, or whether it should rather be considered as…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Efficiency, Expedited arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL WG II Series, Working Group II

, (Chaffetz Lindsey LLP)/ /Leave a comment

UNCITRAL’s Working Group II (“WGII”) resumes next week its work on drafting expedited arbitration provisions (“EAPs”) for use with the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (“UARs”).  One of the key “aims” underlying development of these procedures is “to improve the efficiency and quality of arbitral proceedings.”  This post examines why efficiency matters, how the EAPs encourage efficiency,…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Due process, Expedited arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL WG II Series, Working Group II

(New York International Arbitration Center)/ /Leave a comment

60 member states and several more non-governmental organizations (NGOs) will soon gather (in person in Vienna and virtually) to commence the 72nd Session of UNCITRAL Working Group II (WGII).  The topic and issues of Expedited Arbitration Procedures (EAPs) was primed at the 69th Session of the WGII in New York, including how best to improve…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Consent, Expedited arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL WG II Series, Working Group II

(Stockholm University)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

The UNCITRAL Working Group II (“WG II”) will continue its work on drafting expedited arbitration provisions (EAPs) at its next session in Vienna on September 21 – 25, 2020. This post briefly considers some of the key points that will be addressed at the session relating to the form and scope of the EAPs. This…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Efficiency, Expedited arbitration, ICSID, Investment Disputes, ISDS, Reform, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL WG II Series, Working Group II

(Stockholm University)/ /Leave a comment

Arbitrating investment disputes has its peculiarities stemming out of the nature of the dispute, as well as from the parties involved, which become relevant when assessing the feasibility of implementing expedited arbitration provisions. ICSID Arbitration Rules and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the main arbitration rules currently used for investment arbitration proceedings, are in the process of…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Efficiency, Expedited arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, UNCITRAL WG II Series, Working Group II

(Mihaela Maravela Law Office)/ /Leave a comment

Next week, the seventy-second session of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law’s (“UNCITRAL”) Working Group II (“WG II”), considering the issue of expedited arbitration, will be held in a hybrid system, with participants being able to take part in the session either in person, in Vienna, or remotely, via an online platform. The…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, International arbitration, South Africa

, (Clyde & Co LLP)/ /Leave a comment

International arbitration is on the rise in South Africa.  This is partly a result of the country’s new arbitration law, which was passed in 2017, but now the process has been given a further boost by the publication by the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa (AFSA) of its draft International Arbitration Rules (the Draft Rules),…

Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Early Determination, Efficiency, Enforceability, LCIA Arbitration, LCIA Rules, Virtual hearings

(Enyo Law LLP)/ /Leave a comment

On 11 August 2020 the LCIA unveiled the long-awaited update to its Arbitration Rules (the 2020 Rules). The 2020 Rules will become effective on 1 October 2020 and will apply to arbitrations commenced from that date onwards. They will supersede the 2014 edition of the LCIA Arbitration Rules (the 2014 Rules). The 2020 Rules introduce…

Arbitration, Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, England, LCAM

(Osborne Clarke)/ /Leave a comment

On 26 May 2020, the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), a networking and business support organisation that caters to the London business community, launched the London Chamber of Arbitration and Mediation (LCAM). The LCAM is a new organisation offering arbitration, expedited arbitration and mediation services. This post will explore selected features of the…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Code of Conduct, ICSID, ISDS, UNCITRAL, Working Group III

(Law Offices of Charles H. Camp) and (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek)/ /Leave a comment

Today, there is no universal code of conduct, no single professional regulatory organization or global certification process in the field of investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”). Instead, the field of international arbitration is didactically governed by self-policing, episodic, and distinct ad hoc measures serving to collectively safeguard the integrity of the international arbitration process. On the…

Africa, Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules

(Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP) and (Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment

On 1 July 2020, the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa (“AFSA”), a leading arbitral institution in South Africa, launched its new draft International Arbitration Rules for public comment.  The International Arbitration Rules were launched via a webinar co-hosted by Professor Dr. Maxi Scherer, chairperson of AFSA’s Drafting Committee and Advisory Board, and Patrick Lane SC,…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, ECT Modernisation, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, Reform

(Australian National University) and / /Leave a comment

The Energy Charter Treaty (‘ECT’) opened for signature in 1994, entered into force in 1998, and now boasts some 50 member States. The ECT has since given rise to some 130 investor-State arbitrations, making it “the most frequently invoked international investment agreement”. This high use, coupled with a perception that the ECT is frequently invoked…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Asia, China, Hong Kong, India, Intellectual Property, Paris Arbitration Week, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore, South Korea, Webinar

(Schellenberg Wittmer Pte Ltd)/ /Leave a comment
YSIAC

On 10 July 2020, a panel of arbitration practitioners discussed the topic of “Recent Developments and Key Arbitration Trends in Asia” as part of the 2020 Paris Arbitration Week. The panel discussion covered the distinctive features of and the latest developments in five different jurisdictions: Singapore, China, Hong Kong, South Korea and India. Hosted by…

Arbitrability, Arbitral seat, Arbitration Award, Arbitration clause, Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Enforcement, Paris Arbitration Week, Seat of the arbitration, Virtual hearings, Webinar

(Addleshaw Goddard LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The third edition of the Jeantet “Arbitrating in CEE and CIS” roundtable was held virtually during the Paris Arbitration Week on Wednesday, 8 July 2020. The topic of this year’s edition laid stress upon “Do and Don’t’s When Choosing a Seat and Enforcing in CEE/ CIS/ Russia: State of Play”. Because of both the significant…

Arbitral Award, Arbitral seat, Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings

(Kabine Law Office) and (Equanimity Arbitration)/ /Leave a comment

The COVID-19 pandemic catapulted discussions on online dispute resolution methods like no other phenomenon. With this, determining the proper seat for online arbitration has become the center of conversation. As the world adapted to the challenges presented by the pandemic, so too did international arbitration. Suddenly, there was a wave of virtual hearings, webinars and…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, Investment Arbitration, Organization of Islamic Cooperation

(Allen & Overy LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The recent case of Itisaluna Iraq LLC and Others v. Republic of Iraq represents the first time that an ICSID tribunal had been constituted under the Agreement on Promotion and Protection and Guarantee of Investments among Member States of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (the “OIC Agreement”). The tribunal affirmed that the OIC Agreement contains a…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, COVID-19, Institutional Rules, International arbitration, International Commercial Arbitration, SIAC, Virtual hearings

(SIAC)/ /1 Comment

Background There is much public discourse on the impact of the ongoing pandemic on international arbitrations. Commentators and scholars have provided perspectives on how to navigate and find safe harbours in the uncharted waters of COVID-19. In the “new normal” of wide-ranging travel advisories and restrictions, there is an emerging consensus to better integrate the…

Advance on Costs, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, International arbitration

(Arias SLP) and (Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

It is not uncommon to encounter international arbitration cases in which one party, usually the respondent, refuses to pay the advance on costs set by the institution. This may occur when that party objects to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal or there is a risk that the advance will not be recovered after the…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Expert Appointment, Experts, SHIAC, Witness

, (Shanghai International Arbitration Center)/ /Leave a comment
Shanghai International Arbitration Center (SHIAC)

The use of expert witness is common in international arbitration. Recent discussions amongst Chinese practitioners have centered on the case related to the world-famous Chinese athlete Sun Yang in which the WADA’s expert opinion was believed to be material to the ruling of the CAS tribunal (“WADA vs. Sun Yang”).1)CAS2019/A/6148, World Anti-Doping Agency v. Sun…

ADR, Arbitration Industry, Arbitration institution, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Belt Road Initiative, Case Management, China, CIETAC, Conciliation, Domain Names, Hong Kong, Interim measures, Interviews with Our Editors, Jurisdictional challenge, Macau, Mediation, Taiwan, Tribunal Secretary

(Peter & Kim)/ /Leave a comment
CIETAC Hong Kong Arbitration Center

Dr. Li Hu is Deputy Secretary-General of China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (“CIETAC”), Vice Chairman of China Maritime Arbitration Commission, and also Board Member of the Arbitration Institute of Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. He has authored several publications on dispute resolution in China and has served as arbitrator in over 120 domestic and…

Arbitration, Arbitration Act, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Confidentiality, Due process, KCAB, South Korea, Technology, Videoconferencing

and (KCAB Next)/ /Leave a comment

Significant advances in technology over the last decade have made videoconferencing a viable alternative to traditional, in-person witness examinations in arbitration. As the use of videoconferencing in international arbitration grows more common, we must ask ourselves: do we have the right tools to eliminate the risks that arise with this new technology? This question led…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, BIT, Counterclaims, Enforcement, Investment Arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL WG III Series

(Macchi di Cellere Gangemi)/ /Leave a comment

A cursory reading of the mandate of Working Group III reveals that the discussion at UNCITRAL of ISDS (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) reform focuses only on procedural aspects of dispute settlement under investment treaties and excludes any substantive aspects. However, the topic of respondent states’ counterclaims, albeit procedural in itself, is so inextricably intertwined with substantive…

Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, BIT, Frivolous Claims, Investment Arbitration, Reform, Security for Costs, UNCITRAL WG III Series, Working Group III

, (Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /Leave a comment

Ahead of the thirty-ninth session of UNCITRAL Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform), the General Assembly Secretariat issued a note on issues to be considered on the topic of security for costs and frivolous claims. Averting frivolous claims has been a recurring topic in the ISDS debate over the past years, not least in…

Appellate Court, Arbitration, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, BIT, Investment Arbitration, Reform, UNCITRAL WG III Series, Working Group III

(Albright StoneBridge Group)/ /1 Comment

One of the topics on the agenda of UNCITRAL Working Group III is the establishment of an Appellate Court system. The system of investor-State dispute resolution therefore now faces the fact that WG III is considering, among other matters, the following: the repeal of local law governing the setting aside of an UNCITRAL award giving…