Intra-EU Investment Arbitration

2024 in Review, Achmea, Anti-suit injunction, Colombia, Enforcement, English courts, Immunity, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Sovereign Immunity, UK, United States, United States Courts

(Herbert Smith Freehills)/ /Leave a comment

The doctrine of sovereign immunity has long been a cornerstone of international law, shielding states from enforcement actions. Sovereign immunity can be subdivided in two: immunity from jurisdiction and immunity from execution. While immunity from jurisdiction means that domestic courts are prevented to hear and decide cases involving another sovereign state, immunity from execution precludes…

Access to Justice, Achmea, Europe, European Convention on Human Rights, German Federal Constitutional Court, Germany, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Investment Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS

, (Fietta LLP)/ /Leave a comment

On 13 September 2024, the German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, “BVG” or “the Court”) published two judgments dated 23 July 2024 (available here and here, both in German), accompanied by a press release (here), rejecting as inadmissible two constitutional complaints brought by the claimant in the Eureko (later Achmea) v Slovakia (1) arbitration (“BVG Judgments”).  While other commentators…

Energy Charter Treaty, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Spain, United States Courts

(Pierson Ferdinand) and / /Leave a comment

In a pivotal ruling on August 16, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (“Appellate Court”) addressed whether intra-EU arbitration awards issued under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) are enforceable in U.S. federal courts. With Spain facing over $390 million in awards, the Appellate Court confirmed that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to…

Achmea, EU Law, German Federal Constitutional Court, International Investment Arbitration, International Investment Law, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Investment Arbitration, ISDS

(Schellenberg Wittmer)/ /Leave a comment

On March 6, 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) delivered its (in)famous Achmea judgment (Case C-284/16), which subsequently became synonymous with the demise of investor-state arbitration in bilateral investment treaties between Member States of the European Union (“intra-EU BITs”). In this decision, the CJEU concluded that investor-state arbitration clauses in intra-EU…

EU Law, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Netherlands, State Aid

, (Linklaters LLP; Erasmus University) and (Linklaters LLP)/ /Leave a comment

There is no dull moment in the intra-EU realm. Pandora’s box has long been opened by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) with its Achmea decision leading to numerous ongoing challenges. In a recent ruling, the District Court of Amsterdam (“Amsterdam Court”) had to address a strategic manoeuvre by the Kingdom of…

Eastern Europe, ECT Modernisation, ECT Withdrawal, Energy Charter Treaty, EU Withdrawal Act, European Union, Hungary, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration

(ESSEC Business School, Paris; Paragon Advocacy) and (Permanent Representation of Hungary to the European Union)/ /Leave a comment

On 26 June 2024, 26 of the 27 EU Member States, along with the EU, signed a Declaration on the Legal Consequences of the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) in Komstroy and a Common Understanding on the Non-applicability of Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty as a Basis for…

Arbitration Proceedings, Bucharest, Commercial Arbitration, Conference, IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, ISDS Reform, Romania, Uncategorized

and (Sciences Po; Brigantia Law)/ /Leave a comment

The fifth edition of the Bucharest Arbitration Days (“BArD”) took place on 6 and 7 June 2024. It set out to highlight recent critical developments in international arbitration. The first day focused on commercial arbitration, and the second on investment arbitration. The general consensus? Mission accomplished. Seven panels and two keynotes reunited seasoned experts as…

Anti-enforcement Injunction, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement, Germany, Injunction, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Investment Arbitration, Spain

(University of Cologne (International Investment Law Centre))/ /Leave a comment

On 12 April 2024, the Regional Court of Essen (“LG Essen”) dismissed Spain’s request for an anti-enforcement injunction of an intra-EU investor-state arbitration award (2 O 447/22). The LG Essen held that anti-enforcement injunctions are inadmissible because they violate state sovereignty. This blog post will cover the facts and background of the decision, examine the…

Achmea, BIT, CJEU, Domestic Courts, ECT Withdrawal, Energy Charter Treaty, Europe, foreign direct investment, Foreign Investment, International arbitration, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Investment Arbitration

, (Clifford Chance)/ /Leave a comment

On 25 April 2024, the European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (“EFILA”) held its 9th Annual Conference at Clifford Chance in Frankfurt. The conference was opened by the Chair of the Executive Board of EFILA, Mirjam van de Hel (NautaDutilh) who underscored the importance of discussing the impact of geopolitical uncertainties on international arbitration…

Achmea, Amicus Curiae, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Set aside an arbitral award, Spain

, (BakerHostetler)/ /Leave a comment

On February 2, 2024, the United States filed an amicus brief (the “Amicus”) responding to a request from the United States (“US”) Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to provide the US’ position regarding the enforcement of three “intra-EU” investment arbitration awards issued under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) against the Kingdom of Spain….

Achmea, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, UK

(Fietta LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The English High Court’s judgment in Infrastructure Services v Spain is one of the most important developments of the past year in relation to the enforcement of intra-EU investment awards. It arises out of the Luxembourgish and Dutch claimants’ successful ICSID arbitration against Spain under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”), in which the tribunal held…

Achmea, CJEU, Energy Charter Treaty, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Sweden

(Roschier Attorneys, Ltd.)/ /Leave a comment

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in Komstroy (C-741/19, Sept, 2021) that the dispute resolution mechanism of the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) does not apply in intra-EU investment disputes. The ruling was interpreted by some as the beginning of the end of intra-EU investment arbitration. A recent decision by the…

2022 in Review, Advance on Costs, Annulment, Applicable Law, Duty to Disclose, France, International Public Policy, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration

(Laborde Law) and (Pinsent Masons)/ /Leave a comment

This post provides a review of the most noteworthy arbitration-related developments in France in 2022. In a nutshell, last year, French courts consolidated previous approaches and solutions endorsed in 2020 and 2021, and confirmed major developments of French arbitration law.   The Fear of a Substantive Review of Awards by the Annulment Judge Are French…

Enforcement of an award that was set aside, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, New York Convention

(Linklaters LLP; Erasmus University)/ /Leave a comment

The last decade was not easy for investment arbitration in general, but it faced particular difficulties within the European Union (‘EU’). In recent years, the European Commission has pursued (with success) eradication of this form of international dispute settlement mechanism between foreign investors from one EU Member State and an EU Member State (host state),…

Achmea, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS

(Lévy Kaufmann-Kohler)/ /Leave a comment

The Amsterdam district court has recently refused to order the termination of a London-seated intra-EU investment arbitration against Poland. Whilst the outcome of the judgment is hardly surprising, the decision contains some interesting thoughts on the ‘desirability’ of the Achmea decision. This blog will discuss the current status of Achmea in the case law of…

Achmea, CJEU, Germany, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS

, (Nishimura & Asahi)/ /Leave a comment

On 1 September 2022, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (“HRC Cologne”) issued two much-awaited decisions granting the Netherlands’ requests (see our report here) to have the German claimants’, RWE and Uniper, ECT-based ICSID arbitrations declared inadmissible pursuant to section 1032(2) of the German Code of Civil Procedure (“ZPO”) due to their intra-EU nature. As we reported,…

Achmea, Energy Charter Treaty, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Investor-State arbitration

(University of Vienna)/ /Leave a comment

Amidst the still ongoing negotiations on the modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), which were concluded with an agreement in principle yesterday (24 June 2022), the Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling on Belgium’s request for an opinion on the compatibility of intra-EU investor-state arbitration under a modernised text of…

Achmea, Enforcement, EU Law, Europe, European Law, European Union, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS

(Lenz & Staehelin)/ /Leave a comment

The extent to which different dispute resolution fora are willing to pay deference to the Court of Justice of the EU’s (“CJEU”) seminal (and controversial) Achmea decision is being closely observed by investors and States alike. 1) Not to mention the European Commission, which has sought to make itself heard in numerous proceedings relating to intra-EU…

CJEU, Energy Charter Treaty, International arbitration, International Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Investment Arbitration

(European Institute, London School of Economics)/ /Leave a comment

Intra-EU investment agreements and arbitration have been a highly divisive issue in European policy circles for decades. The European Commission has been forcefully pushing for the termination of these agreements since the early 2000s. It criticised inter alia that intra-EU investment agreements and arbitration undermine the European legal order and create inequality among European investors…

CJEU, ECJ, Energy Charter Treaty, European Union, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Investment

(NL-Investmentconsulting)/ /7 Comments

No doubt, the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) has become the hottest topic in the investment treaty arbitration world. Not only are EU Member States the most frequent respondent in ECT disputes – for example, the Netherlands has recently received its first ECT claim – but the ECT itself is currently in the middle of a…

Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration

(Konrad Partners)/ /Leave a comment

After more than two years of an ever-evolving Achmea-saga, we shall now reap the fruits. Many arbitral tribunals have rejected the application of the CJEU’s findings, such as in the ICSID arbitration UP and C.D. Holding Internationale v Hungary or the ECT arbitration in Vattenfall v Germany (see e.g. here). More recently in June 2020,…

Achmea, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforceability, Enforcement, ICSID, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration

(WilmerHale)/ /Leave a comment

After the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rendered the Achmea decision, heated discussions on its impact ensued. Particularly, the concern raised on whether the ICSID proceeding provided for in intra-EU BITs and intra-EU disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) would be valid. Several arbitral tribunals and national courts have dealt with…

Arbitration, Arbitration Agreement, EU Law, Europe, Immunity, Intra-EU BIT's, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Reform

(University of Passau) and (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP)/ /Leave a comment

Whenever litigating against states or sovereign entities – or international organisations for that matter – outside of their home jurisdiction there is a roadblock to consider: immunities. On closer inspection, immunities turn out as two roadblocks: immunity from jurisdiction and immunity from enforcement. Whereas the general assumption is that an agreement to arbitrate waives immunity…

International Law, Intra-EU BITs, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Investment Arbitration, Sunset clauses

(WAGNER Arbitration)/ /Leave a comment

The long-awaited Agreement to terminate intra-EU BITs (bilateral investment treaties) was signed on 5 May 2020 (the “Termination Agreement”). According to the European Commission, the Termination Agreement “implements the March 2018 European Court of Justice judgment (Achmea case), where the Court found that investor-State arbitration clauses in [intra-EU BITs] are incompatible with EU Treaties.” The…