Investment Arbitration

Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Costs in arbitral proceedings, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Singapore International Arbitration Centre, Witness

(Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /Leave a comment
WilmerHale

The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC”) has issued new rules that came into force on April 1, 2013. The rules changes are accompanied by new Practice Notes for cases administered by SIAC under its rules and the UNCITRAL rules that also came into force on the same date. While the changes do not reflect a…

BIT, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /1 Comment

and Oleg Temnikov I. Bureau Veritas v. Republic of Paraguay In the recent Further decision on objections to jurisdiction dated October 9, 2012 the tribunal in Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC B.V. v. Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/9) dismissed BIVAC’s claim based on violation of the fair and equitable standard by reasoning…

Applicable Law, BIT, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration

(Colibra Insurance)/ /Leave a comment

In Part I it was argued that the proper law applicable in the investor-State disputes under Article 42 (1) ICSID Convention depends on the substantive grounds of the investor’s claim. In support of this, I have outlined three factual scenarios and types of claims with evidence from case law. Part I dealt with host State…

Applicable Law, BIT, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration

(Colibra Insurance)/ /Leave a comment

Rationalizing applicable law in investor-State disputes in absence of express choice of law under Article 42 (1) of ICSID Convention PART I Article 42 of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention) determines the powers of an arbitral tribunal constituted under the ICSID Convention as…

BIT, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /Leave a comment

and Oleg Temnikov There is a Taoist fable of the three stupid men who were traveling together from one village to the next. They rested for the night under a banyan tree. In the morning, it turned out that the travelers have forgotten whose shoes are whose. Because none of the three men was able…

Applicable Law, Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Uncategorized

(University of Victoria Faculty of Law)/ /Leave a comment

At a conference a few years back, a well-known and respected arbitrator was speaking on the topic of predictability and consistency of arbitral decision making in investment treaty arbitration.  The arbitrator asked whether arbitrators should fly solo or in flocks.  He made a strong and persuasive case for the independence of the arbitrator, to fly…

BIT, Consent, Damages, Dispute, Investment Arbitration, Uncategorized

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
YIAG

On February 6, 2013, Achmea (a Dutch insurer, better known by its former name, Eureko) initiated UNCITRAL arbitration proceedings against the Slovak Republic on the basis of the Agreement on encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (the “Netherlands-Slovakia BIT“) [The Agreement on…

BIT, ICSID Convention, International Law, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Jurisdiction, Treaty Shopping

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /1 Comment

Akbar the Great once drew with his royal hand a line in the sand. He then told his wise men that if they wanted to keep their jobs, they must invent a way to make the line shorter without touching any part of it. Wise man after wise man approached the line and stood in…

Evidence, International Courts, Investment Arbitration, North America, Section 1782 Discovery

(Notre Dame Law School)/ /Leave a comment

I have posted on SSRN my latest article, “Ancillary Discovery to Prove Denial of Justice” just published in the Virginia Journal of International Law. It analyzes Section 1782 discovery proceedings in the context of BIT arbitration and argues that there is now uniform agreement among federal courts that investment arbitration panels are “international tribunals” within…

Annulment, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, arbitrators’ conduct, ICSID Convention, Investment Arbitration

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /Leave a comment

An earlier post examined the general limitations on arbitral discretion. This part will look into the question of actions taken proprio motu and the limits thereto. Functions exercisable proprio motu are perceived as a special case of application of the discretionary powers enjoyed by a tribunal. Actions taken proprio motu must be distinguished from functions…

Foreign Investment Law, International arbitration, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection

(Investment Arbitration Reporter)/ /Leave a comment

In an earlier post, I’d highlighted five notable legal highlights from 2012. Below, and somewhat belatedly, I offer my post-mortem on some key policy developments from 2012. 1. Venezuela and South Africa beat a retreat Venezuela’s exit from ICSID was perhaps the most visible policy story of 2012. The move could bolster the caseload of…

Annulment, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, arbitrators’ conduct, Damages, ICSID Convention, Investment Arbitration

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /Leave a comment

The problem of arbitral discretion has major implications on the rights of the parties. It is a concept foundational to international arbitration. Yet, it has proven to be so elusive as to escape any definition or treatment in literature. Why is this topic important? In order to answer this question, let us take pre-award interest…

Asia-Pacific, Foreign Investment Law, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Legislation

(Mishcon de Reya)/ /Leave a comment

On 2 November 2012, President Thein Sein approved, after several months of intense debate between Parliament and the Government, Myanmar’s new Foreign Investment Law (‘FIL’ or ‘the Law’).  The new Law revises the framework for foreign investment in Myanmar which had been in place since a military coup in 1988. Considering the country’s abundant natural…

Foreign Investment Law, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Umbrella clause

(Arnold & Porter LLP)/ /Leave a comment

by Patricio Grané and Brian Bombassaro The year 2012 brought eight new investor-state arbitration decisions on umbrella clauses.1)(1) Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Republic of Paraguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29, Award (Feb. 10, 2012), (2) EDF International S.A., SAUR International S.A. and Leon Participaciones Argentinas S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/23, Award…

CAFTA, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, NAFTA, Trans-Pacific Partnership

(Public Citizen)/ /Leave a comment

As described in Part 1 of this post, the mounting debate about investor-state dispute resolution (ISDR) has crescendoed in the current Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations. There are at least two “schools” of concern with ISDR, both of them voiced inside and outside the TPP context. Threats to Public Interest Policy For a growing array of…

ICSID Convention, International arbitration, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Trans-Pacific Partnership

(Public Citizen)/ /1 Comment

Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations have become the territory where a brewing perfect storm over investor-state dispute resolution (ISDR) is making landfall. The June 2012 leak of the draft TPP Investment Chapter text added energy, but much more is fueling this tempest. In general the ISDR system is coming under increased scrutiny. Public and policymaker concerns…

Arbitrators, Foreign Investment Law, Investment Arbitration, Third party funding, Treaty

(Corporate Europe Observatory )/ /4 Comments

By Pia Eberhardt, Corporate Europe Observatory, and Cecilia Olivet, Transnational Institute At the end of November, Corporate Europe Observatory and the Transnational Institute published Profiting from Injustice, a report that looks at the role of law firms, arbitrators and third-party funders in investment treaty arbitration. In it, we argued that the arbitration industry has fuelled…

Dispute Resolution, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Uncategorized

(Investment Arbitration Reporter)/ /1 Comment

In the final days of 2012, I spent some time flipping back through the stories we’ve covered at Investment Arbitration Reporter, looking to identify the year’s most notable developments. I’ve settled on ten that I think are particularly noteworthy. Half of them are legal in nature, and are highlighted below. The other five are in…

Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration clause, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Arbitration Proceedings, Commercial Arbitration, Corporate Counsel's view, Domestic law, English Law, Expedited arbitration, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Convention, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, LCIA Arbitration, New York Convention

(Conway & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

There are many clients who are often engaged in industrious works that result in disputes. Typically, the applicable arbitral agreements requirement submitting claims to international arbitration and, in this author’s opinion, appropriately so. However, these same clients may also be subject to frequent claim assertions that lack any true merit. Despite this, there is not…

Applicable Law, BIT, Damages, ICSID Convention, Investment Arbitration, State entity, Treaty, Umbrella clause

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /Leave a comment

The problem of the law applicable to State contracts (i.e. contracts concluded between a foreign national and a State or a state entity) as well as the responsibility of States for the breach of these contracts has entertained the minds of scholars and practitioners ever since the famous PCIJ dictum in the 1929 Serbian Loans…

Arbitration Awards, Arbitrators, BIT, Costs in arbitral proceedings, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Jurisdiction

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /15 Comments

“Research is formalized curiosity…” – Z. Hurston In what follows I have tried to gather information from publicly available sources regarding some of the questions which have troubled my mind lately. It is hoped that the results would be of interest to the readers. For me, this proved to be one of my most exciting…

International Law, Investment Arbitration, Trade

(Notre Dame Law School)/ /1 Comment

So we all know that investment arbitration tribunals have relied on WTO precedent for persuasive authority as to the meaning of various terms in bilateral investment treaties. (Think the emergency exception in the Argentina arbitrations and references to WTO Article XXI). But does the reverse also happen? Do WTO panels or the WTO Appellate Body…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Commercial Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration

(Conway & Partners)/ /3 Comments

Last Monday I was honored with the opportunity to serve as one of the speakers for the annual ICC New York Conference. With an overflowing turnout and impressive list of panelists, it was a successful event. One interesting event of note was that the ICC took this opportunity to release the ICC Commission Report on…

Confidentiality, Confidentiality and Transparency, Costs in arbitral proceedings, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment Arbitration, NAFTA, Not-for-profit organizations (NGO), Transparency in investment arbitrations, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Independent Arbitrator)/ /1 Comment

Monday’s New York conference on “Arbitration with States and State Entities under the ICC Rules” got me thinking about the possibility of amicus submissions in investment cases before the ICC or other institutions beyond ICSID. A few musings: Are amicus debates likely to arise in the ICC context? The answer is yes. Although most ICC…