Investment

Dispute Resolution, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Uncategorized

(Investment Arbitration Reporter)/ /1 Comment

In the final days of 2012, I spent some time flipping back through the stories we’ve covered at Investment Arbitration Reporter, looking to identify the year’s most notable developments. I’ve settled on ten that I think are particularly noteworthy. Half of them are legal in nature, and are highlighted below. The other five are in…

Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Arbitrator Challenges, Arbitrators, arbitrators’ conduct, Confidentiality, Conflicts of interest, Costs, Costs in arbitral proceedings, Damages, Disclosure, Dispute Resolution, Enforcement, Investment

(University of Portsmouth)/ /1 Comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

As its Council Member I attended the ICC Institute of World Business Law’s 32nd annual meeting on ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration’ held in Paris on 26 November 2012. It was a grand success as it drew many professionals, arbitrators, experts, academic specialists and, above all, representatives from some major third-party funding bodies such as…

Arbitration Awards, Arbitrators, BIT, Costs in arbitral proceedings, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Jurisdiction

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /15 Comments

“Research is formalized curiosity…” – Z. Hurston In what follows I have tried to gather information from publicly available sources regarding some of the questions which have troubled my mind lately. It is hoped that the results would be of interest to the readers. For me, this proved to be one of my most exciting…

BIT, Energy Charter Treaty, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment protection

(Stockholm University)/ /Leave a comment

The notion of ‘investment’ has been one of the most controversial issues in arbitral proceedings instituted under the ICSID Convention. The award rendered by the UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal in Romak v. Uzbekistan has brought the issue outside of the ICSID context and concluded that, despite the broad definitions of ‘investment’ in Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs),…

Domestic Courts, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration

(Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /Leave a comment
WilmerHale

In August 2011, the tribunal in Abaclat and others v Argentina decided (by a majority) that it had jurisdiction over claims brought by approximately 60,000 Italian investors, and that the claims were admissible.1)Argentina has in the meantime requested the disqualification of the two arbitrators responsible for the decision and the proceedings are currently suspended. The…