Investor-State arbitration

Energy Charter Treaty, Investor-State arbitration, Investor-state tribunals, ISDS, Procedure, Provisional measures

(Università degli Studi di Trieste and Luiss Guido Carli)/ /Leave a comment

On 23 July 2024, an ICSID arbitral tribunal in the case Klesch Group v. Germany issued a decision on provisional measures directing the respondent State to refrain from collecting certain windfall profits tax in order to protect the exclusivity of the ICSID arbitral proceedings and the status quo between the parties. This post will summarize…

ACICA, Asia, Australia, Australian Arbitration Week, Corporate Social Responsibility, Energy, Energy Dispute, Environmental protection, ESG, Investor-State arbitration, Oil & Gas, Price revision, Renewable energy, Third party funding

(Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration)/ /Leave a comment
ACICA

On 15 October 2024, Norton Rose Fulbright hosted a breakfast panel discussion on the topic of “Hot Cakes and Hot Takes: Trends and Developments in Asia’s Energy Sector” in Brisbane as part of Australian Arbitration Week. The panel was moderated by Dylan McKimmie, Head of Arbitration and Co-Head of Energy, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia and…

Attribution, Awards, Investor-State arbitration, Investor-state tribunals, ISDS

, (Kim & Chang)/ /Leave a comment

On 11 April 2024, the Permanent Court of Arbitration published the award in Mason Capital L.P. and Mason Management LLC v. Republic of Korea (PCA Case No. 2018-55) (“Mason”), reaching the same substantive result as last year’s award in Elliott Associates L.P. v. Republic of Korea (PCA Case No. 2018-51) (“Elliott”), while disagreeing on the…

Australia, Hearings, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS, ISDS Reform, PCA, Permanent Court of Arbitration, Transparency, Transparency in investment arbitrations

(University of Sydney & Williams Trade Law)/ /Leave a comment

On 4 August 2023, in an investor-State dispute settlement (“ISDS) arbitration commenced against Australia on 29 March 2023 under the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (“ASEAN”) Australia New Zealand Agreement for a Free Trade Area (“AANZFTA”), Singapore-incorporated Zeph filed an application for interim measures including an unusual request. Zeph sought an order that Australia’s “officers…

Investment Disputes, Investor-State arbitration, Non-Disputing NAFTA Parties, Non-Disputing Parties

(US Department of State, Office of the Legal Adviser)/ /Leave a comment

Non-disputing Party submissions (“NDPs”) have been a prominent part of the U.S. investor-State dispute settlement (“ISDS”) practice over the last twenty-five years, with an uptick in the number of recent filings. With almost a hundred NDPs filed in investment arbitrations to date (not including oral submissions, which have become a more regular practice), NDPs have…

Canada, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration, NAFTA, Suspension of Proceedings, USMCA

(Carleton University)/ /Leave a comment

For the first time under Rule 54(2) of the ICSID 2022 Arbitration Rules, the Tribunal in Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/23/5) had to decide on a request for suspension of the proceeding. In its Request for Suspension, Canada asked the Tribunal to suspend the proceeding until the Tribunal in TC…

Annulment, Enforcement, Investor-State arbitration, Public Policy, Swiss Private International Law Act, Switzerland

(Walder Wyss)/ /Leave a comment

On 26 April 2024, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (“SFSC”) rendered decision 4A_486/2023, upholding the unpublished Final Award in Clorox Spain S.L. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Clorox v. Venezuela”) (PCA Case No. 2015-30). In the underlying investment treaty arbitration, Clorox sought compensation for the alleged expropriation and unfair treatment of its investment by Venezuela,…

Constitutional Court, Ecuador, ICSID Arbitration, International arbitration, International Investment Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS, Latin America, Trade and investment agreements

, , (Tadir Dispute Resolution)/ /1 Comment

The Ecuadorian government held a referendum and a public consultation on 21 April 2024. Question D of the referendum asked citizens: “Do you agree that the Ecuadorian State recognizes international arbitration as a method to resolve disputes related to investment, contractual, or commercial matters?” (free translation). The substantive proposal of the question was merely based…

Expropriation, ICSID, Investor-State arbitration, Latin America, Panama

, (Reed Smith)/ /1 Comment

In the 2022 case of Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/42), the Tribunal faced the challenge of distinguishing between a state’s sovereign acts and its commercial activities. This case raised the critical question of when a state’s conduct shifts from exercising sovereign authority to acting as a…

foreign direct investment, Foreign Investment, Free Trade Agreements, India, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment law, Investment protection, Investment Treaties, Investor, Investor duties, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS, Protection, State-State Dispute Settlement, State-to-state arbitration

(Jindal Global Law School)/ /Leave a comment

It took 16 years of negotiations for India and the European Free Trade Association (“EFTA”)—comprising Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein—to clinch a free trade agreement (“FTA”). The newly minted FTA is expected to boost the extant levels of trade between the two countries. The formal name of the signed agreement is the Trade and Economic…

Arbitration, Energy, Energy Charter Treaty, Energy Dispute, EU Law, European Law, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment Disputes, Investment law, Investment protection, Investment Treaties, Investor-State arbitration, Investor-state tribunals, Italy, Jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, Jurisdictional challenge, Renewable energy

(Università degli Studi di Trento)/ /Leave a comment

On March 11, 2024, an ICSID arbitral tribunal (Juan Fernández-Armesto (President), Wendy Miles, Alexis Mourre), rendered an award in Encavis AG and Others v. Italy. The controversy follows some other 14 disputes initiated by EU investors against the Italian State under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) (some of these discussed here) and falls into the…

Canada, CETA, Europe, European Commission, European Union, Expedited arbitration, Expedited Proceedings, Expropriation, Fair and Equitable Treatment, FET, International Investment Arbitration, International Investment Law, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment Disputes, Investment law, Investment protection, Investment Treaties, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS

(Clifford Chance)/ /Leave a comment

Although parts of CETA have been provisionally applied since 21 September 2017, the parts not subject to provisional application – including the investment chapter (CETA’s Chapter Eight) which covers investment protection and dispute resolution – are still pending domestic ratification procedures in 10 EU Member States. In parallel, CETA’s framework for investment protection and dispute…

Access to Justice, Albania, Arbitral Award, Arbitration, Enforcement, European Court of Human Rights, Foreign arbitral awards, Investment Arbitration, Investment Disputes, Investor-State arbitration, Investor-state tribunals, ISDS, Recognition, Recognition and enforcement of arbitral award

, (Fietta LLP)/ /Leave a comment

On 5 March 2024, the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR” or “the Court”) delivered its judgment in Iliria S.R.L. v. Albania (“Iliria”), a case concerning a complaint under Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR” or “the Convention”) relating to a more than 17-year delay in the conclusion of recognition (exequatur) proceedings…

Climate change, Environment, ESG, Investment Disputes, Investment protection, Investor-State arbitration, Investor-state tribunals, Sustainability, Sustainable economy

, , (King & Wood Mallesons)/ /Leave a comment

Following our previous post on dispute resolution in carbon markets, the ICSID Tribunal in Koch Industries, Inc. and Koch Supply & Trading, LP v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/52 (“Koch v. Canada”) recently dismissed the Claimants’ USD 31.3 million claims arising out of a cap-and-trade emissions programme on jurisdictional grounds. The Tribunal’s key findings included…

CIArb, Climate change, Commercial Arbitration, Conference, Investor-State arbitration

(Erasmus University Rotterdam)/ /Leave a comment

On 6 February 2024, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CiArb) European Branch/French Chapter held a seminar at the Paris office of Bird & Bird moderated by Jalal El Ahdab (Bird&Bird) and Alexandre Malan (Belot Malan & Associés) on a crucial topic: Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) issues and their impact on international arbitration. The panel discussion…

Climate change, Investment Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration

(Climate Change Counsel)/ /Leave a comment

On 24 April 2024, the European Parliament voted for the EU to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”). Three days earlier, Ecuador had voted to keep the country’s constitutional ban on investor-state arbitration. These events mark the last chapters in the increasingly turbulent tale of investment treaties and investor-state arbitration. Over the past few…

Bolivia, Illegality, Investor-State arbitration, Latin America, Unclean Hands

(Dentons Guevara & Gutierrez)/ /Leave a comment

For several years, the uncertainty of the (un)clean hands principle has been subject to debate due to the diverse approaches taken by arbitral tribunals. However, in September 2023, the tribunal in Glencore Finance (Bermuda) Ltd. v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia (PCA Case No. 2016-39) may have indirectly settled the uncertainty. The case proposes a…

Investor-State arbitration, Law of the Sea

(University of Padua)/ /Leave a comment

On the 22nd of December 2023, an ICSID tribunal rendered its award in the case of Peteris Pildegovics and Sia North Star v. Kingdom of Norway. The case is of particular interest insofar as it focuses on the interaction among different branches of international law, namely investment law and the law of the sea. This…

European Commission, European Union, Investment protection, Investor-State arbitration, Model Clauses

, , (Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In October 2023, the European Commission published a Non-Paper of Annotations to Model Clauses for Negotiation or Re-negotiation of Member States’ Bilateral Investment Treaties (“BITs”) with Third Countries (“Model Clauses”) (“Non-Paper”). Non-papers are informal documents usually put forward in closed negotiations with EU institutions. The views in this Non-Paper do not necessarily communicate an official…

China, Enforcement, Investment Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration, Sovereign Immunity

, (Hui Zhong Law Firm)/ /3 Comments

Introduction  On September 1, 2023, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) Foreign State Immunity Law (“CFSIL”, bilingual version here).  It will enter into force on January 1, 2024, together with the amended Chinese Civil Procedure Law 2023 (“CPL 2023”, English translation here).  The new legislation not…

Investment Disputes, Investor-State arbitration, USMCA

(Clark Hill PLC)/ /Leave a comment

When the USMCA entered into force on 1 July 2020, the general view was that the agreement would limit the ability of investors to file investment arbitration claims because the new rules offered limited access to the ISDS mechanism compared with NAFTA. Furthermore, investors from Canada and the U.S. face an additional restriction as ISDS…

Damages, International Investment Arbitration, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS, UNCITRAL

(Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law)/ /Leave a comment

Readers with antennas tuned to the happenings of the reform process for investor-State dispute settlement at UNCITRAL will know that the topics of damages and causation are on the agenda.  Indeed, at the last sessional meeting of Working Group III, draft provisions on damages and causation were discussed.  These provisions might find their way into…

BIT, Enforcement, India, Investment Disputes, Investor-State arbitration, Jurisdiction, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore, Switzerland

, (Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

In 2013, Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”), a German corporation, commenced an UNCITRAL arbitration in Switzerland under the Germany-India BIT claiming that India had (amongst other things) breached the fair and equitable treatment (“FET”) standard. In the arbitration, India raised various jurisdictional objections, which the Tribunal rejected in an Interim Award issued on 13 December 2017….

ACICA, Australian Arbitration Week, Investment agreements, Investment protection, Investor-State arbitration

(Errard Legal)/ /Leave a comment
ACICA

A beautiful Perth morning on Thursday, 12 October 2023 saw the convening of the panel – “Resolving Disputes on Major Projects – Lessons Learned from Recent Arbitration Proceedings”. The panel was moderated by Brian Millar of Francis Burt Chambers, and was generously hosted by Herbert Smith Freehills. The panel was conducted under the Chatham House…