Investor

Energy Charter Treaty, Investment, Investment protection, Investor

(Bottega Di Bella)/ /Leave a comment

In an interesting post published on Kluwer Arbitration Blog by Eric Leikin and Martina Magnarelli, it is described in a very comprehensive manner the state of play as regards the soundness of Respondents and European Commission’s arguments refusing the jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals in intra-EU ECT claims. Among these arguments (all rejected by the tribunal…

Class arbitration, Energy, Investment protection, Investor, Israel

(Meitar Law Offices)/ /Leave a comment

A. Introduction Investments in a foreign country entail risks for the investors. These include the possibility that their investments will be nationalized or expropriated if, for example, a political change occurs. There is also a risk of loss as a result of war, armed conflict, revolution, a state of national emergency, etc. However, on 29…

Annulment, BIT, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Investor-State arbitration, ISDS, Zimbabwe

(NL-Investmentconsulting)/ /Leave a comment

Recently, it was reported that after 14 years since Zimbabwe had illegally evicted Dutch farmers from their farms, it finally agreed to pay the damages awarded under the ICSID award, which dates back in 2009. In the Funnekotter et al case, the arbitral tribunal rejected Zimbabwe’s necessity defence, which was based on the claimed need…

Arbitration, Eastern Europe, Fair and Equitable Treatment, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Investor-State arbitration, Switzerland

(Bottega Di Bella)/ /6 Comments

In the 2000s, mortgages in Swiss Franc (CHF) were very popular among consumers in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe for the acquisition of both private and commercial properties, as the CHF was a stable and reliable currency and offered lower interest rates than loans in Euro or in local currencies. When on 15 January 2015…

Albania, Arbitration, Courts, Criminal law and arbitration, England, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Investor-State arbitration, Provisional measures

(Doughty Street Chambers)/ /Leave a comment

Since the first application for provisional measures suspending criminal proceedings in Tokios Tokelés v. Ukraine (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Order No. 3, 18 January 2005), the number of applications before ICSID tribunals for these types of measures has steadily increased. Recent applications have been widely commented on in the arbitration community, including in this blog….

Argentina, Awards, BIT, foreign direct investment, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, Insurance, International arbitration, Investor, Investor-State arbitration, Jurisdiction, Political Risk Insurance

(Fangda Partners) and (CMS Hong Kong)/ /Leave a comment

“And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.” (Anaïs Nin) Introduction and background On 12 July 2017, CMS Hong Kong and the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) hosted the fourth joint lecture in their quarterly series focusing on the…

Fair and Equitable Treatment, Investment protection, Investor, U.S. Supreme Court, United States

(Three Crowns LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Three Crowns LLP

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently issued an en banc decision, in International Refugee Assistance Project IRAP v Trump, affirming the district court’s injunction against President Trump’s Executive Order temporarily suspending entry into the United States by individuals from six Muslim-majority countries. Although the case concerns the application of specialized U.S….

Energy, Energy Charter Treaty, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(Bocconi University)/ /Leave a comment

The ICSID Tribunal in the case Eskosol S.p.A. in Liquidazione v. Italian Republic (ICSID Case No.ARB/15/50) has recently issued a Decision on Respondent’s Application under Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). In 2015, Eskosol filed a Request for Arbitration based on Italy’s claimed violation of the Energy Charter…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, ICSID, ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, ISDS

(Stockholm University)/ /2 Comments

In October 2016, the ICSID advised the Member States of the ICSID Convention that it was beginning the fourth amendment process since the enactment of the definitive ICSID Arbitration Rules in 1967. The first amendment to the Rules took place in 1984 and mainly referred to the possibility to resort to national courts for provisional…

Disputed Territories, Investment, Investment protection, Investor

(Meitar Law Offices)/ /Leave a comment

On March 14th the Investment Treaty Forum at The British Institute of International and Comparative Law hosted a panel of experts to discuss practical and legal aspects of investments protection in the context of territorial disputes. Territorial disputes sometimes lead to the annexation of the territory of one state by another, of which the annexation…

Enforcement, Investment, Investor, ISDS, Permanent Court of Arbitration, Singapore, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

(Fangda Partners), (Holborn Law LLC (in association with CMS Singapore)), and (CMS Hong Kong)/ /1 Comment

In early March 2017, the Singapore High Court released a judgment in which it considered an important question of enforcement of investor-state awards. In Josias Van Zyl v Kingdom of Lesotho [2017] SGHCR 2, AR Pereira was asked to decide whether an order to enforce a final award in a treaty dispute administered by the…

BIT, European Commission, European Law, European Union, ICSID Convention, Intra-EU BITs, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Poland, Sweden

(Stockholm University)/ /1 Comment

On 8 March 2017, the Romanian Parliament sent to the Romanian President for promulgation the Law allowing for the termination of the Bilateral Investment Treaties between Romania and other Member States of the European Union (“Intra-EU BITs”). This comes after Poland adopted a similar measure at the beginning of January 2017 and with the European…

Arbitration, Arbitration Proceedings, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Energy Charter Treaty, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(University of Aberdeen)/ /Leave a comment

Bosnia and Herzegovina (“BiH”) is generally perceived as a good emerging market for investment. The country is rich with natural resources and has a long tradition of industry with favorable and attractive locations and resources. Potential areas of investment include banking and finance, energy and mining, construction and IT (ICT) sector. The relevant national framework…

Arbitration, Australia, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

, / /1 Comment

On 30 November, Australia’s Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCOT) released its Report 165 on its inquiry into the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). JSCOT is a 16-member parliamentary committee tasked with advising the Australian parliament on ratification of treaties. This article presents an overview and discussion of the Report’s findings on ISDS, the most common…

Brazil, BRICS, Fair and Equitable Treatment, India, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Model BIT, The Netherlands

(Lazareff Le Bars)/ /Leave a comment
ArbitralWomen

Much Ado About India’s Protectionist Model BIT The last week of November 2016 was an eventful and rather paradoxical week for India. While India and Brazil successfully concluded negotiations for a new Bilateral Investment Treaty (“BIT”), the India-Netherlands BIT expired. India has spent the past year refurbishing its investment agreements. According to UNCTAD, India is…

Arbitration, Arbitration Proceedings, Investment Arbitration, Investor, Montenegro

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /Leave a comment

Co-authored with: Oleg Temnikov, Wolf Theiss Background In a recent award issued in the case of CEAC Holdings Limited v. Montenegro (ARB/14/8, Award, 26 July 2016) the arbitral tribunal had to decide whether CEAC Holdings Limited (hereinafter: “CEAC”) was a protected investor within the meaning of the applicable Cyprus–Serbia and Montenegro BIT. Under Article 1…

BIT, China, Customary international law, Expropriation, Fair and Equitable Treatment, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investor, Laos, Macau, Singapore, Singapore Court of Appeal, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

, , (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /1 Comment
WilmerHale

Part I of this two-part blog post summarized the recent judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal (“SGCA” or the “Court”) in Sanum Investments Ltd. v Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (“Sanum v Laos”). This Part II provides some comments on that judgment and its significance, including its impact on future Singapore court…

BIT, China, Customary international law, Expropriation, Fair and Equitable Treatment, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investor, Laos, Macau, Singapore, Taxation, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

, , (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /Leave a comment
WilmerHale

On 29 September 2016, the Singapore Court of Appeal (“SGCA” or the “Court”) released its much-anticipated judgment in Sanum Investments Ltd. v Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (“Sanum v Laos”). In a carefully reasoned decision, Singapore’s apex court reversed a decision of the Singapore High Court, which had previously held that an UNCITRAL…

Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Peru, UNCITRAL

(The John Marshall Law School)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

Gramercy Funds Management LLC, a U.S.-based hedge fund (“Gramercy”), recently filed a notice of arbitration against the Republic of Peru pursuant to the investment chapter of the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement (“U.S.-Peru TPA”), seeking USD 1.6 billion in damages. Although Peru announced that it filed an initial response to Gramercy’s notice in early July, the…

Balkans, BIT, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment protection, Investor, Trade

/ /2 Comments

Just like a century ago – and throughout their entire history – the Balkans remain a zone of structural instability. In this respect, the ‘end of history’ has not come around to the fringes of Europe, as Francis Fukuyama once optimistically expected. Therefore, although the Balkan area is an essentially coherent cultural sub-space, while still…

Dual Nationals, Investment Arbitration, Investor, ITA

(Covington and Burling LLP)/ /Leave a comment

YAI TALKS#, a new conversation series launched by the ITA Young Arbitrators Initiative (YAI) under the leadership of YAI chair Montserrat Manzano (Von Wobeser y Sierra, Mexico City) and vice chair Silvia Marchili (King & Spalding, Houston), kicked off on May 12 in Washington, D.C., with a debate on claims by dual nationals against countries…

Ad hoc arbitration, BIT, Dispute Resolution, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, ISDS, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, Uncategorized

(Australian National University)/ /Leave a comment

As Mariel Dimsey has observed, a key challenge posed by investment treaties is that – at the point of ratification – they expose States to arbitrations of ‘as-yet-unknown scope and against as-yet-unknown claimants’. Gus van Harten and Martin Loughlin argue that this feature differentiates investment disputes from those heard in other fora, transforming investment disputes into something akin to ‘domestic judicial review of state conduct’….

Arbitration, BIT, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, ISDS

(WongPartnership LLP)/ /1 Comment
YSIAC

“ISDS” (short for “investor-state dispute settlement”) was a less-known acronym some years back. Now, it has been given an increasingly bad name, no doubt fuelled by Vattenfall’s claim against Germany following the shutting down of its nuclear plants after the 2011 Fukushima disaster, tobacco giant Philip Morris’ high profile claims arising from Australia’s plain-labelling laws,…

BIT, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Poland

(Linklaters) and / /Leave a comment

It is not unusual that a foreign investor is put in a situation where the investment has not been infringed yet and no damage has been caused, but an infringement is very likely to happen. The investor is then often left without any available domestic recourse, which is particularly true as regards general legislative measures….