Judicial intervention

Domestic Courts, Domestic law, International Investment Arbitration, International Investment Law, Judicial intervention, Legitimate Expectations

(NOVA School of Law and PLMJ Lawyers)/ /Leave a comment

On 12 November 2024, an ICSID tribunal rendered its award in the case of Telefónica S.A. v. Republic of Colombia. At its heart, the case concerns the protection of foreign investors’ legitimate expectations under a bilateral investment treaty (“BIT”), and, more unusually, the international legal consequences of a decision by a national constitutional court affirming…

Judicial intervention, SIAC, SIAC Rules 2025, Singapore, Singapore International Arbitration Centre

(HFW Singapore LLP) and / /Leave a comment

Can a court interfere with an administrative decision of an arbitral institution? In this article, we discuss the recent decision of DMZ v DNA [2025] SGHC 31 (“DMZ”) in which the Singapore High Court (“SGHC”) ruled that courts cannot intervene in decisions of the SIAC Registrar (“Registrar”) and reaffirmed the principle of minimal curial intervention…

Belt Road Initiative, China, Conference, ESG, ICSID, Judicial intervention, UNCITRAL, United States

/ /Leave a comment

Columbia Arbitration Day (CAD), held on April 14, 2023, enjoyed record attendance levels this year and was held in the historic Low Memorial Library, a fitting venue for the first in-person CAD since before the COVID-19 pandemic.   The Judiciary in International Arbitration Proceedings The morning began with a panel moderated by Professor Alejandro Garro…

Judicial intervention, Latin America, Preliminary measures, Provisional Application, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal) and , (Marval O'Farrel & Mairal)/ /Leave a comment

The Commercial Court of Appeals in the City of Buenos Aires recently granted a request for preliminary measures. These measures aimed to obtain the necessary elements to analyze and determine whether the counterparty had breached a stock purchase agreement that included an arbitration clause as the dispute-settlement mechanism. In this post, we discuss whether courts…

India, Judgment, Judicial intervention, Jurisdiction

(JSA, Advocates & Solicitors) and (J. Sagar Associates)/ /Leave a comment

India is witnessing a protracted corporate battle — fought before multiple courts and an India-seated SIAC arbitral tribunal — for control over one of its largest retail chains. This heavily publicised dispute between Amazon and the Future group took an unexpected turn in January this year when a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court…

Appeal, Appointment of arbitrators, India, Judicial intervention

(Gujarat National Law University)/ /Leave a comment

In a March 2021 decision, Pravin Electricals Pvt. Ltd. v. Galaxy Infra and Engineering Pvt. Ltd. (“Pravin Electricals”), a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court (the “Court”) shed light on an “anomaly” that exists in the operation of Sections 8 and 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “Act”). The Court clarified its…

2020 In Review, Annulment, Appeal, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Bankruptcy and arbitration, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Commercial Arbitration, Confidentiality, Corruption, COVID-19, Duty to Disclose, Emergency Measure, Enforcement, Judicial intervention, Latin America, Mexico, Peru, Transparency, Venezuela

(Herbert Smith Freehills)/ /Leave a comment

Corruption, annulment of arbitral awards and court intervention mark the main developments for 2020 in Latin America.  Our contributors this year reported on the most important judicial decisions and legislative measures impacting the legal framework of various jurisdictions in the region. A new ‘hot topic’ arising from the COVID-19 pandemic is the interplay between arbitration…

China, Court Assistance, Judicial intervention, judicial review, PRC

(Pepperdine Caruso School of Law, Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution) and (China Arbitration Institute of China University of Political Science and Law)/ /Leave a comment

In March 2020, the official Beijing judiciary website published the ground-breaking Big Data Research Report on Cases of the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People’s Court Involving Judicial Review of Arbitration (北京市第四中级人民法院仲裁司法审查案件大数据研究报告) (the “Report”). Prepared by the China Arbitration Institute of China University of Political Science and Law (中国政法大学仲裁研究院), the Report covers 18 months of decisions involving “judicial review”…

Arbitration Agreement, India, Judicial intervention, United States Courts

, (Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University Lucknow)/ /Leave a comment

Most of the contemporary discourses on pre-arbitral judicial interference in India entail the scope of the judicial enquiry required before the constitution of an arbitral tribunal. As it currently stands, Section 8 (for arbitrations seated in India) and Section 45 (for foreign-seated arbitrations) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“1996 Act”) have the potential…

Arbitration, Enforcement, Judicial intervention, Nigeria, Party autonomy

(The Law Crest LLP)/ /Leave a comment

Introduction Party autonomy is the underlining principle of arbitration. The courts ought to have it in mind whenever they are called upon to intervene in matters related to arbitration. The right of parties to resolve their dispute by arbitration must be upheld and given effect to. When the judiciary acts to give effect to this…

Appointment of arbitrators, India, Judicial intervention

(Law Chambers of Kapur & Trehan)/ /1 Comment

Introduction Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of India, 1996 (the Act), demonstrates in detail the procedure for appointment of arbitrators. It empowers the court to examine the existence of an arbitration agreement while deciding the application for such appointment. The gravity and significance of such proceedings is vast, in both domestic and…