Jurisdiction

Australia, Enforcement, ICSID, ICSID Convention, International Investment Arbitration, Sovereign Immunity, State Immunity, UK

, , (Clayton Utz)/ /Leave a comment

The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID Convention) contains two provisions regulating compliance with arbitral awards. Article 53(1) provides that an award shall be binding on the parties. Article 54(1) requires each contracting State to recognise an ICSID award as binding. In this regard, it is common for parties to comply with…

Arbitration, Interim measures, Reform, Ukraine

(Selepey, Volkovetsky & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

In recent years, arbitration has been gaining traction in Ukraine as a fast and efficient method for dispute resolution. It was against this background that in December 2017 a long-awaited reform of procedural legislation was carried out (hereafter referred to as the ‘Reform’). The Reform introduced several pro-arbitration measures. Among these, the Reform sought to…

Accession to the EU, Achmea, CJEU, Micula, Romania, State Aid

(Lévy Kaufmann-Kohler)/ /Leave a comment

According to Advocate General Maciej Szpunar, the Micula case is symbolic of the ‘conflictual relationship’ between EU law and international investment law. Indeed, the European Commission has persistently objected to the execution of the ICSID award issued in Micula, not because of the principles of autonomy and mutual trust that underpinned the Achmea judgment, but…

Anti-arbitration Injunction, Russia, Sanctions

(Enyo Law LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In mid-2020, changes were enacted to the Russian Arbitrazh (Commercial) Procedure Code (“APC”) which established the exclusive jurisdiction of Russian Arbitrazh courts over cases where a Russian party is subject to sanctions or where the dispute has arisen out of sanctions. This raised concerns that sanctioned Russian parties would be able to easily avoid arbitration…

Constitutional Court, Ecuador, ICSID Convention, Investment protection, Ratification

(Tobar ZVS)/ /Leave a comment

On 15 January 1986, Ecuador signed the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States (“ICSID Convention”). During President Rafael Correa´s administration (2007-2017), President Correa publicly expressed his hostility towards the ICSID Convention and the international investment protection system. In 2008, Ecuador denounced over a third of its bilateral…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Conflicts of interest, Russia

, (Russian Arbitration Center)/ /Leave a comment

Conflicts of interest between parties and arbitrators are common in arbitration proceedings. However, the academic community has not yet examined whether arbitral institutions may also run into conflicts of interest. This post will deal with this question and also examine measures that can mitigate any such risks of conflicts of interest for arbitral institutions. The…

Anti-suit injunction, Malaysia

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
AIAC Young Practitioners Group (AIAC YPG)

An increasing number of anti-arbitration injunctions applications have come before the Malaysian courts within the last two years. Anti-arbitration injunctions can take various forms but are essentially judicial orders restraining the initiation or continuation of arbitration proceedings in Malaysia or, as the case may be, a foreign jurisdiction. What has emerged from the Malaysian courts…

Brussels Regulation, France

(Linklaters LLP) and (Linklaters)/ /Leave a comment

In a judgment dated 22 June 2021, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled that liability claims against arbitrators fall within the “arbitration exception” of Article 1(2)(d) of the Brussels I recast regulation, leading to the application of French private international law rules to determine the competent courts. The Paris Court of Appeal further considered that…

Costs in arbitral proceedings, ICC Arbitration, Jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore, Terms of Reference

(Advocate, Arbitrator and Mediator) and / /Leave a comment

The Singapore Court of Appeal (“CA”) recently handed down CBX and anor v CBZ and ors [2021] SGCA(I) 3 (“CBX”), setting aside, exceptionally, the awards.1)The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the authors, and are not representative of the organisations they are affiliated with. Significantly, the law was clarified, to a…

Emergency Arbitrator, Enforcement, SCC Rules, Ukraine

/ /Leave a comment

The institution of emergency arbitration (EA), in general, and its usage in investment treaty-based disputes, in particular, is a relatively new procedural tool. In investment disputes, EA has reportedly been carried out in practice only under the Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (the “SCC Rules”). Conducting EA proceedings in…

Australia, Choice of Law, Proper law of arbitration agreement

(Howells’ List)/ /Leave a comment

There have been significant legal developments in recent times in Australia concerning the proper choice of law applicable to an arbitration agreement. Cases have centred on how to give effect to parties’ choice. But there are other laws which, despite not being chosen by the parties as the law applicable to the arbitration agreement, may…

Enforceability, Incapacity, Non-existent parties, Null and void, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore

(Singapore Attorney-General’s Chambers)/ /Leave a comment

Where C commences an arbitration against a non-existent entity E, and D defends the arbitration in the guise of E, can an award rendered in favour of E be enforced by D against C?1)This article is written in the author’s personal capacity. The opinions expressed are entirely the author’s own, and do not reflect the…

Appointment of arbitrators, Australia

/ /Leave a comment
Rising Arbitrators Initiative (RAI)

On 30 May 2021 the fifth webinar of the series “The Rising Arbitrator’s Challenge: Navigating the Premise and Perils of Your First Appointment(s)” covering Australia and New Zealand was presented by ACICA45 in collaboration with the Rising Arbitrators Initiative (RAI). RAI was created in September 2020 to support arbitration practitioners under 45 who have either…

Annulment, Applicable Law, Arbitrator Challenges, Emergency Arbitrator, Taiwan, UNCITRAL Model Law

(The Arbitration Chambers and Bond University)/ /Leave a comment

Although Taiwan’s legislative and judicial practices already conform to the spirit of the New York Convention (“Convention”) and the Model Law, it appears that non-Taiwanese parties nevertheless remain hesitant to arbitrate in Taiwan. The necessity of becoming a Model Law jurisdiction arises from Taiwan’s inability to accede to the New York Convention. Hence an institutional…

BAC, China, CIETAC, Emergency Arbitrator, HKIAC, Hong Kong, Interim measures, interim relief

(Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre)/ /Leave a comment

In 2019, Mainland China and Hong Kong entered into a groundbreaking bilateral arrangement regarding interim measures for arbitration, i.e., Arrangement Concerning Mutual Assistance in Court-ordered Interim Measures in Aid of Arbitral Proceedings by the Courts of the Mainland and of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the “Arrangement”).1)Thanks to Lingming Xu for his contribution to…

Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy and arbitration, Insolvency, Switzerland

, (rothorn legal)/ /Leave a comment

The economic havoc wreaked by the Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a 10-year high of corporate bankruptcies in the United States in 2020. While bankruptcy levels across Europe have fallen amid the pandemic, a sharp spike in corporate bankruptcies is expected as economic support programs phase out in the coming months. This will increase the…

Achmea, Admissibility, Arbitration, Arbitration Proceedings, CJEU, Domestic Courts, Energy Charter Treaty, German law, Germany, ICSID, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Netherlands, UNCITRAL

, (Nishimura & Asahi)/ /1 Comment

The Achmea saga has taken yet another twist. In a recent communication to the Dutch Parliament, the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate disclosed that it initiated “anti-arbitration” proceedings before the German courts on 11 May 2021 to “avert” two ECT-based ICSID arbitrations brought against it by the German energy companies RWE and Uniper (“Communication”)….

Hong Kong, Investment Treaties, investor-State arbitration and mediation, ISDS, Japan

, (City University of Hong Kong)/ /Leave a comment

In March 2021, a major newspaper broke the story that a Hong Kong investor had filed what may be considered the very first investment treaty arbitration claim against Japan under the Hong-Kong Bilateral Investment Treaty (Hong Kong, China SAR – Japan BIT 1997). While it may take anywhere from a few months to a few years…

Arbitral seat, Arbitration Act, Arbitration institution, Institutional Rules, Japan, Japan Commercial Arbitration Association, JCAA

(Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Singapore LLP) and (Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu)/ /Leave a comment

On 31 May 2021, the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (“JCAA”), Japan International Dispute Resolution Center (“JIDRC”), and the Japanese Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”) co-hosted a webinar on developments in arbitration in Japan and Japan’s potential as an international arbitration hub. Some of the key takeaways from the event include: positive experiences with the physical and…

Independence and Impartiality, Social networks, Supreme Court, Switzerland

/ /6 Comments

Independence and impartiality of an arbitrator are sine qua non in an arbitration proceeding. It is for this reason that jurisdictions, all across the globe, have taken significant measures to elaborate on the circumstances that may raise justifiable doubts as to the independence and impartiality of an arbitrator. However, one sphere remained untapped, until recently….

Colombia, Dual Nationals, Investor-State arbitration, Jurisdiction, United States

, (GST LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The issue of dual nationals’ access to investor-state dispute settlement (“ISDS”) has once again taken the center stage through the recently issued Carrizosa v. Colombia award. Resolved under the auspices of the 2013 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the PCA tribunal unanimously dismissed the entire case for lack of jurisdiction ratione personae, in accordance with the provisions…

Asset Management, India, Sovereign Immunity, state-owned

, (Nishith Desai Associates)/ /Leave a comment

In the last decade, fifteen cases have been filed by foreign investors against India under various bilateral investment treaties (BITs).  Of these, three major cases were spurred by the ill-reputed retrospective taxation by India in 2012, allegedly targeted towards certain foreign investors namely: (i) Vodafone International Holdings BV v. The Republic of India (Vodafone case);…

Canada, conflict of interest, Ethics, judicial review, NAFTA, National Courts, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

(Association ARBITRI)/ /1 Comment

The story of counsel ethics in international arbitration is very much like Cinderella’s fairytale. Once the clock struck midnight, all that remained was her glass slipper. This left the prince to search the kingdom for a maiden with the perfect fit for a “happily ever after”. Counsel ethics in international arbitration similarly involve an ongoing…

Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Austria, VIAC

, (Vienna International Arbitral Centre-VIAC)/ /Leave a comment

The Vienna International Arbitral Centre (“VIAC”) announces its most recent update to the VIAC Rules of Arbitration and Mediation (the VIAC Rules of Arbitration and Mediation 2021) taking effect on 1 July 2021. The revision of the VIAC Rules of Arbitration and Mediation was triggered by the drafting of the new standalone set of VIAC…