Set aside an arbitral award

2024 in Review, Arbitration Agreements, Dutch Supreme Court, Enforcement, Exequatur, Multi-tiered clauses, Netherlands, Netherlands Arbitration Institute, Set aside an arbitral award

(Avizor Advocates & Arbitrators)/ /Leave a comment

Following the Blog’s tradition of “year-in-review” series, this post reflects on the key arbitration developments in the Netherlands in 2024. What emerges from this review is the Netherlands’ strong arbitration-friendly culture, notably reflected in the release of the 2024 Netherlands Arbitration Institute (“NAI”) Arbitration Rules and a pro-arbitration stance in court decisions. However, a notable…

Abusive Claims, Estoppel, Parallel Proceedings, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore, Stay of Proceedings

(HFW Singapore LLP) and (WongPartnership LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In the recent Singapore High Court (“Court”) case of DJA v DJB [2024] SGHCR 10 (“DJA v DJB”), the Court was tasked with determining the novel question of whether the general legal principles for an application for a case management stay apply when an applicant seeks a case management stay of its own application to…

Arbitration Agreement, Germany, Interim measures, Set aside an arbitral award

, (Luther)/ /Leave a comment

On 12 July 2024, more than 25 years after adopting its current arbitration law, the German government agreed on a draft reform law (“Draft Law”). It is based on a White Paper issued in April 2023 (reported here), including comments received thereon (see here). The now adopted version (dated 26 June 2024, to be submitted…

Austria, Corporate disputes, Non-arbitrability, Set aside an arbitral award, Shareholder Resolutions

, (PARAGON Advocacy)/ /Leave a comment

The setting aside of an arbitral award is a rarity in the Austrian legal landscape. However, on 3 April 2024, the Austrian Supreme Court (the “ASC”) issued a landmark decision setting aside an arbitral award on the grounds of non-arbitrability of the subject matter. As explained below, the court’s reasoning is remarkable and its implications…

Annulment, Bias, Canada, Domestic Courts, Set aside an arbitral award

(Mechantaf Law)/ /Leave a comment

On 11 April 2024, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (“Court”) issued its decision in Ballantry Construction Management Inc. v GR (CAN) Investment Co. Ltd., arising from an application to enforce two arbitration awards filed by Ballantry Construction Management (the “Applicant”). The Respondent in this application, Investment Co. Ltd, sought an order setting aside the awards…

Set aside an arbitral award, Sweden, Swedish Arbitration Act

(Westerberg & Partners Advokatbyrå AB)/ /Leave a comment

To colour within the lines is something many of us pride ourselves to have mastered perhaps some time ago. Crossing the lines with a hasty movement may ruin an otherwise nice picture. Similarly, an otherwise good arbitration may be spoiled if the tribunal fails to stay within the lines drawn up by the parties. Like…

Arbitration, Qatar, Qatar Financial Centre, Recognition and enforcement of arbitral award, Set aside an arbitral award

, , (Sultan Al-Abdulla & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

On 5 May 2024, the Civil and Commercial Court of the Qatar Financial Centre (“Court”), rendered its judgment in B v C on a setting aside application brought under the QFC Arbitration Regulations 2005 (“QFC Arbitration Regulations”). This is an important judgment because it is the first Court judgment commenting on the setting aside of…

Arbitration, Latvia, Reform, Set aside an arbitral award

, (COBALT)/ /Leave a comment

Latvia has recently taken significant steps to amend its arbitration law, introducing a set-aside mechanism among other necessary changes. This article provides an overview of the background to these changes, the specifics of the new set-aside mechanism, and other amendments made to the Latvian arbitration law.   Background Elimination of any or all grounds for…

Belgium, BIT, Court of Appeal, Enforcement, Final Award, Poland, Public Policy, Set aside an arbitral award

(Crowell & Moring) and (A&O Shearman)/ /Leave a comment

The Brussels first instance court attracted significant attention in 2022 by deciding to set aside an UNCITRAL award regarding a claim brought against the Republic of Poland under the US-Poland bilateral investment treaty (“US-Poland BIT”).  This was the first time we had seen a Belgian court set aside an investment treaty award.  The first instance…

India, Set aside an arbitral award

, (AZB & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

2023 saw India take focused steps to strengthen and fortify its stand as a champion of arbitration, promoting a hands-off judicial approach in favor of arbitral autonomy. The year started with the Indian Supreme Court’s first step in NTPC Limited vs SPML Infra Limited, where the Supreme Court categorically held that a tribunal is the…

Achmea, Amicus Curiae, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement, Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, Intra-EU ISDS, Set aside an arbitral award, Spain

, (BakerHostetler)/ /Leave a comment

On February 2, 2024, the United States filed an amicus brief (the “Amicus”) responding to a request from the United States (“US”) Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to provide the US’ position regarding the enforcement of three “intra-EU” investment arbitration awards issued under the Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”) against the Kingdom of Spain….

2023 in Review, Annulment, Canada, Due process, Procedural Fairness, Recognition and enforcement of arbitral award, Set aside an arbitral award

(Woods LLP)/ /Leave a comment

This Part 2 continues reflections on key arbitration-related developments in Canada during 2023. Whereas Part 1 addressed the courts’ approaches to arbitrator independence and impartiality and the unconscionability of arbitration agreements, this Part 2 shines light on different takes on procedural fairness and “fresh evidence” in post-award proceedings.   What is “Proper Notice”? The past…

Dutch Supreme Court, Netherlands, Set aside an arbitral award

(Lévy Kaufmann-Kohler) and (Allen & Overy)/ /Leave a comment

Under Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law (“Model Law”), an arbitral award may be set aside if the arbitration agreement is “not valid”. A more controversial issue is whether setting aside avenues should also be available in the opposite scenario, i.e., when a tribunal found that no valid arbitration agreement existed and declined jurisdiction….

Chile, Latin America, Set aside an arbitral award, Set aside an international arbitral award

(Ugarte & Correa) and (Ugarte & Correa - Abogados Chile)/ /Leave a comment

In 2004, Chile enacted Law No. 19.971 on International Commercial Arbitration (“LACI”) based on the UNCITRAL Model Law of 1985 (“Model Law”). This note describes, without assessing its merits, how the process to resolve an application to set aside awards has evolved in practice in Chile (“Application for Set Aside” or “Application”), the sole remedy…

BIT, Enforcement, India, Investment Disputes, Investor-State arbitration, Jurisdiction, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore, Switzerland

, (Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

In 2013, Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”), a German corporation, commenced an UNCITRAL arbitration in Switzerland under the Germany-India BIT claiming that India had (amongst other things) breached the fair and equitable treatment (“FET”) standard. In the arbitration, India raised various jurisdictional objections, which the Tribunal rejected in an Interim Award issued on 13 December 2017….

Hungary, New York Convention, Set aside an arbitral award, UNCITRAL Model Law

(SMARTLEGAL Schmidt & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

Making an awkward legislative step, the Hungarian legislator introduced a new ground for annulling construction arbitration awards from 5 June 2023, which applies where arbitrators fail to deliberate the opinion of a domestic expert body. While many commentators have criticised this amendment because of its potential retroactive effect and its disharmony with the current international…

Appeal, Arbitration Procedure, Australia, Bifurcation of proceedings, Estoppel, Functus Officio, Interim Award, Set aside an arbitral award

(Level Twenty Seven Chambers) and (LK Law)/ /1 Comment
ACICA 45

In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Western Australia (“WA”) Court of Appeal confirmed that courts have the conclusive authority to determine the jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals. The Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA) (the “Act”) confers competence upon arbitral tribunals to determine their own jurisdiction. However, courts retain authority to review questions of jurisdiction….

Confidentiality, Disclosure, Dissenting opinions, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore

(Rajah & Tann Asia)/ /1 Comment

This might not be a secret: the Singapore courts recently issued two decisions in June 2023 about confidentiality in the international arbitration context. The first, The Republic of India v Deutsche Telekom AG [2023] SGCA (I) 4 (“India v DT”), concerned the availability of court-ordered confidentiality protections after information about the arbitration (whose confidentiality is…

Annulment, Arbitral seat, Due process, Party Representation, Powers of the tribunal, Public Policy, Seat of the arbitration, Set aside an arbitral award, Set aside an international arbitral award, VIAC, Vietnam

, (EPLegal)/ /Leave a comment
Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC Vietnam)

Under the Law on Commercial Arbitration 2010 (“LCA”), both domestic and international arbitral awards can be set aside on the basis that the arbitral award contravenes the “fundamental principles of Vietnamese law.” This concept, however, is undefined and broad, causing much uncertainty, especially in light of decisions of the Vietnamese courts. In 2020, the People’s…

Enforcement, Poland, Set aside an arbitral award

, , (Kubas Kos Gałkowski)/ /Leave a comment

Our previous post on this Blog explored the Polish post-award case law from 2020. We tried to answer whether Poland is an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction. And we concluded that out of the more than 200 proceedings we have been able to review, arbitral awards were set aside or refused enforcement / recognition only in a relatively…

Latvia, Set aside an arbitral award

, (COBALT)/ /Leave a comment

On February 24, 2023, the Latvian Constitutional Court issued a long-awaited Judgement in case 2022-03-01 confirming that the current control mechanism over arbitration in Latvia is incomplete and unconstitutional. This means that the government will now be required to introduce a procedure for setting aside arbitral awards made by tribunals seated in Latvia.   Background…

CJEU, Energy Charter Treaty, European Convention on Human Rights, Investment, Paris Court of Appeal, Set aside an arbitral award, Stay of Proceedings, United States Courts

(ICC International Court of Arbitration) and , (Mayer Brown)/ /Leave a comment

On 10 January 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal (“Paris CoA”) set aside the 50+ million USD UNCITRAL award rendered in the dispute between Komstroy (before Energoalians LLC, and now Stileks Scientific and Production Firm LLC (“Stileks”)) and the Republic of Moldova. The referring court applied the ruling rendered by the Court of Justice of…

Jurisdiction, Pleadings, Remission, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore

(Singapore Management University)/ /Leave a comment

When determining what matters fall within the scope of submission to arbitration, five sources are relevant: the parties’ pleadings, the agreed list of issues, opening statements, evidence adduced, and closing submissions: CDM v CDP [2021] 2 SLR 235 at [18]. If a court, on an analysis of these five sources, finds that an award should…

AIAC, Appeal, Costs, Domestic arbitration, Malaysia, Set aside an arbitral award

(Asian International Arbitration Centre)/ /Leave a comment
Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC)

Introduction The second day of the Asia ADR Week 2022 kicked off with a panel discussion on Rechartering a Modern Legislative Framework with Mr Abang Iwawan (Abang & Co.) as moderator. Mr Iwawan was joined by Ms Karen Ng Gek Suan (Karen, Mak & Partners), Mr Rajendra Navaratnam (Azman Davidson & Co.), Mr Foo Joon…