UNCITRAL Model Law

Procedural Fairness, Set aside an arbitral award, SIAC, Singapore, Singapore Court of Appeal, Singapore International Arbitration Centre, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, UNCITRAL Model Law, Witness, Witness Conferencing, Witness Statement

, (Clyde & Co Clasis Singapore)/ /Leave a comment
Clyde & Co.

In CBS v CBP [2021] SGCA 4 the Singapore Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s ruling in CBP v CBS [2020] SGHC 23, being a rare example of the Singapore Courts setting aside an award. The arbitrator’s decision not to allow a hearing for oral witness evidence was found to be a breach of…

Arbitration Act 1996, Enforcement, India, UNCITRAL Model Law

and , (Trilegal)/ /2 Comments

The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment Act), 2021 (“2021 Amendment”) is the most recent intervention in, what appears to be, the Indian Parliament’s endless attempts to tinker with the scheme and intent of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“1996 Act”). The 2021 Amendment, which was passed into law on 10 March 2021 follows the Arbitration…

Enforcement, India, Interim measures, UNCITRAL Model Law

, (Pallav Mongia Law Chambers )/ /2 Comments

Similar to Article 9 of the UNCITRAL Model Law (the “Model Law”), Section 9 of India’s Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) entitles the parties to arbitration proceedings to obtain interim relief from courts. However, there is one major difference between these two provisions. Article 9 of the Model Law allows parties to obtain…

Arbitration Act, Central Asia, UNCITRAL Model Law, Uzbekistan

(Al Tamimi & Company), (SHERLAW), and (Galadari Advocates & Legal Consultants)/ /Leave a comment

Since 2016, the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan has been implementing significant political, legislative, judicial, economic, and social reforms with the aim of developing the country, enhancing its investment climate, and improving the lives of its citizens at a much more rapid pace than before.1)The authors were the lead international arbitration experts and resources…

Arbitration, Disclosure, Domestic Courts, Emergency Arbitrator, Public Procurement, State Aid, Tender Dispute, UNCITRAL Model Law

, (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP)/ /Leave a comment

Competitive tendering for construction and engineering contracts is an essential element of business for the industry. Huge expenditure is devoted to public infrastructure projects and effective competition is essential to achieve value for money and appropriate use of public funds. The World Bank estimates that Governments worldwide spend US$9.5 trillion in public contracts every year….

Arbitrators, Code of Conduct, Disclosure, Diversity, ISDS, ITA, Liability, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Esguerra Asesores Jurídicos)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

The ITA (Institute for Transnational Arbitration) – ALARB (Latin American Society of Arbitration) Americas Workshop took place virtually on 2-4 December 2020. The conference focused on the role of arbitrators, their liabilities, challenges, and the need for increased diversity efforts. The conference was co-chaired by Julie Bédard (Skadden, New York), and Maria Inés Corrá (Bomchil, Buenos…

Infra and Ultra Petita Challenges, Set aside an arbitral award, UNCITRAL Model Law

/ /Leave a comment

Readers of this blog are well familiar with the sharp criticism international arbitration faces on account of the quality of legal reasoning in arbitral awards. Traditionally, much of the prolific debate has revolved around the arbitrators’ duty to give reasons. Recent cases (here and here), however, have sparked a discussion on the arbitrators’ failure to…

Annulment, Enforcement, Indonesia, Interim measures, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Asian International Arbitration Centre) and (KarimSyah Law Firm)/ /Leave a comment
Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC)

12th August 2020 marks the 21st anniversary of the Indonesia’s Law Number 30 Year 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“Arbitration Law”).1)Any comments/views expressed in this article are those of the authors only. They do not reflect the views of KarimSyah Law Firm or AIAC unless otherwise stated. Culture wise, many countries, especially Indonesia, venerate…

Canada, Commercial Arbitration, Employment arbitration, Uber v. Heller, UNCITRAL Model Law

/ /Leave a comment

Most individuals with involvement in international arbitration—as a scholar, practitioner, arbitrator, or as a brave student participating in a moot competition—have cited Gary Born for some legal principle. Indeed, sometimes this name is cited by opposing sides in support of their contrary legal arguments. While this has been a common practice among students and, in…

Canada, Commercial Arbitration, Employment arbitration, Uber v. Heller, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Vancouver Arbitration Chambers & Arbitration Place) and , (Queen's University Faculty of Law)/ /Leave a comment

From practically the moment the Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) decision in Uber Technologies v Heller was released, commercial arbitration practitioners and scholars—including on this blog—have criticized it for weakening the cherished competence-competence principle. We submit that those who defend Uber’s problematic arbitration clause in the name of protecting competence-competence love arbitration not wisely, but…

AIAC, Emergency Arbitrator, Malaysia, Non-signatory, Set aside an arbitral award, UNCITRAL Model Law, Winding Up Applications

, (Asian International Arbitration Centre) and (Al Tamimi & Company)/ /Leave a comment
Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC)

Amid the rise of arbitration-friendly regimes, Malaysia has emerged as one of the preferred seats of arbitration in Asia. Several coordinated factors support Malaysia’s emergence as a pro-arbitration jurisdiction. These include significant amendments to the Arbitration Act 2005 (the “Act”), the pro-arbitration position taken by the Malaysian Judiciary, and the rise of the Asian International…

Canada, National Courts, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Queen's University) and (Queen's University Faculty of Law)/ /Leave a comment

With a feature presentation on “Major Milestones in Canadian Arbitration Law”, the Canadian Journal of Commercial Arbitration launched last week before an online audience of several hundred arbitration practitioners, scholars, and students from around the world. “Our aspiration for the Journal is to contribute materially to bringing together, and strengthening the professional bond, among all…

Arbitration Agreement, Canada, Domestic Courts, Employment arbitration, Uber v. Heller, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP)/ /3 Comments

On June 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) released a decision with significant implications for international businesses by placing significant limits on the application of arbitration clauses.   Background The case, Uber Technologies Inc. v Heller (2020 SCC 16 ) (“Heller”), involved a challenge to Uber’s standard agreement with drivers requiring disputes to…

Applicable Law, Construction arbitration, judicial review, UNCITRAL Model Law

(PotamitisVekris Law Firm)/ /Leave a comment

In a recent decision in XPL Engineering ltd. v. K & J Townmore Construction ltd. [2019] IEHC 665, the Irish High Court decided to refer a construction dispute to arbitration on an application by the defendant, K & J Townmore Construction Ltd, for an order under Article 8 (1) of the UNCITRAL Model Law referring…

Set aside an arbitral award, Supreme Court, Ukraine, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Jursvneshservice)/ /Leave a comment

On 9 October 2019 the Supreme Court of Ukraine 1)This article refers to the Supreme Court created in the course of the judicial reform of 2016 in Ukraine. (Supreme Court) rendered a decision in a case on setting aside an arbitral award that goes completely against Article 3 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International…

Hungary, Set aside an arbitral award, UNCITRAL Model Law

(SMARTLEGAL Schmidt & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

Two and a half decades have passed since Hungary harmonised its arbitration law with UNCITRAL Model Law (‘Model Law’) in 1994. This marked a giant leap forward, especially as the adopted provisions were made applicable not only in international, but in purely domestic arbitrations as well. This post analyses the Hungarian case law on setting…

ADR, Arbitration Act, Arbitration institution, Law of the Sea, National Arbitration Laws, Philippine Arbitration Convention, Philippines, Recognition and enforcement of arbitral award, Singapore Mediation Convention, South China Sea, UNCITRAL Model Law

, / /Leave a comment

The year 2019 was a milestone year for alternative dispute resolution (“ADR“) in the Philippines. It saw the inaugural Philippine Arbitration Convention organized by the Philippine Institute of Arbitrators (“PIArb“) on 25 November 2019 (the “Arbitration Day“), the signing of the Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (the “Singapore Convention“), the implementation of…

Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Agreements, IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest, Party appointed arbitrator, selection of arbitrators, UNCITRAL Model Law

(ANR LAW LLP)/ /Leave a comment

An asymmetrical arbitration clause is one where only one party can choose the method of resolving disputes between the parties. A slightly varied form of such a clause is usually contained in statutory arbitrations, which involve lop-sided arbitration clauses where only one party has the right to appoint the arbitrator. At first brush, these clauses…

Emergency Arbitrator, India, Singapore International Arbitration Centre, UNCITRAL Model Law

(SIAC)/ /1 Comment

This post covers an interesting discourse during the Singapore International Arbitration Centre’s Summit in New Delhi on 30 and 31 August 2019. In particular, the post focuses on the discussions during Panel Session 1: ‘Masterclass on the use of Institutional Procedures in Arbitration’ held on the second day of the summit. This session was moderated…

Canada, Class arbitration, Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), North America, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP) and / /Leave a comment

Introduction The United States and its neighbor to the north, Canada, share the world’s longest border, a common language, and similar values, resulting in one of the most stable and mutually beneficial international business relationships in the world. Indeed the United States is Canada’s largest trading partner, and Canada is the United States’ second largest…

Jurisdiction, Jurisdictional challenge, Singapore Court of Appeal, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Drew & Napier)/ /Leave a comment
YSIAC

Art 16(3) of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (“Model Law”) provides that if a tribunal issues a preliminary ruling that it has jurisdiction, a respondent may appeal the tribunal’s ruling to the relevant court within 30 days. Can a party who loses a jurisdictional challenge still set aside the final award for…

Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, Finland, UNCITRAL Model Law

(The Arbitration Institute of the Finland Chamber of Commerce (FAI))/ /Leave a comment

The Finnish Minister of Justice announced at the end of January this year that the revision process of the 1992 Finnish Arbitration Act would be launched during the current government term. Finnish business and arbitration communities greatly welcomed the statement, as it mirrors their long-time efforts towards this goal. The Ministry of Justice has begun…

Azerbaijan, Domestic arbitration, Enforcement, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL Model Law

(ICC)/ /1 Comment

I address the regulation and practice of arbitration in Azerbaijan, a topic which has not been discussed widely on an international level. While there is a significant uniformity in international arbitration legislations around the world due to the New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (hereinafter the “New York Convention”) and…

Arbitration, Arbitrators, Belgium, UNCITRAL Model Law

/ /Leave a comment

Background The Dutch-speaking division of the Brussels Enterprise Court has been understaffed in recent years. On 5 February 2019, the Court’s president issued a press release (here) revealing rather troublesome news that, imminently, the Court will comprise only six full time judges and hearings will be delayed by some two years. The Brussels Enterprise Court is…