the need for arbitrators to clarify what “narrow” and “specific” actually mean in practice. While the IBA Rules aim for a common standard, interpretations vary across jurisdictions. From the arbitrator’s…

…modalities of review sometimes differ, particularly with respect to the treatment of new evidence and review of relevant elements of fact (see here). In England and Wales, for example, courts…

…of additional judicial resources and the development of specialized rules/practice directions to expedite arbitration-related matters (paragraph 15), building on some of the innovations in the Arbitrations Proceedings Rules (“The Rules”)…

…2(o)(ii), of the Convention, rules, regulations and procedures based on the principles contained in sections 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of this Annex, as well as any additional rules,…

…a matter of “formality”. Further, because there was no evidence of what legal relationships are considered as commercial under Indian law, the Full Court proceeded to examine this issue on…

…shall bind Defendants who were non-parties to the agreements, taking into consideration various circumstances such as the history of the conclusion and performance of the relevant construction contracts and heavy…

…increasingly taking center stage.   Practical Implications for International Practitioners For international practitioners, understanding the interplay between state and federal laws in the U.S., and their relation to international trends…

…enabling them to agree on arbitral clauses, select applicable rules, and appoint the arbitral tribunal, with a corresponding limitation on judicial review. Such a restriction does not violate the Constitution…