…Commission indirectly divested the functions granted to ICSID tribunals and ad hoc committees (Chapter VII ICSID Convention). In particular, the Commission’s scrutiny implemented to the Micula Award could be treated…

…the provisions of the Convention at the municipal level. Having satisfied itself that Germany, the jurisdictional origin of the award subject to enforcement, qualified as another Convention country, the Court…

…reflects Article V(1)(e) of the New York Convention (“NY Convention”) which provides that recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused if the party proves “[…]that the award has…

…pay, through arbitration. The main benefit will be the enhanced enforceability of “judgment-converted-awards” under international enforcement instruments typically applicable to international arbitration awards, e.g. the 1958 New York Convention on…

…the relevant dispute are party also to the Convention; in other cases the position is less clear (see Articles 30(3) and 30(4) of the Vienna Convention). Second, the Convention does…

…India-France BIT (“BIT Arbitration”), naming the Republic of India, the State of West Bengal and the Port Trust as Respondents. India is not a signatory to the ICSID Convention and…