…ICSID arbitral tribunals’ decisions (ESF v. Spain and Sapec v. Spain), which for the first time, have accepted the intra-EU law objection, thus declining their jurisdiction in intra-EU ECT disputes….

…ever since, the post-Achmea effects have echoed over the years through EU policies, jurisprudence on intra-EU and non-EU ISDS cases, and in courtrooms where enforcement proceedings for intra-EU awards unfold….

…arbitration requires weighing financial exposure, reputational risk, and the broader political context of intra-EU investment disputes. Cases like KELAG’s raise the question: are ESG initiatives genuine tools for accountability and…

…arbitrations as involving identical causes of action. The two treaties—Croatia-Netherlands and Croatia-Israel BITs—certainly contain similar language; but does similarity of wording amount to identity of obligation? The Vienna Convention on…

…driven (on intra-African arbitration, see, e.g., SOAS 2024 Report, at p. 7). Rather, they should reflect local needs, commercial realities, and legal traditions. This is especially important in matters involving…

…the region, alongside development of Model BITs reflecting the country’s negotiating position. Diora Ziyaeva shifted focus to Uzbekistan’s evolving arbitration framework. With mediation gaining traction, new questions surface—like the availability…

…case that intra-EU arbitration is incompatible with EU law, States in intra-EU arbitrations have raised the Achmea decision as a barrier to arbitral jurisdiction and, often, to the enforcement of…

…(but only in the preamble) Yes (but only voluntary promotion of applicable investments) EU–Kyrgyzstan EPCA (trade / investment chapters only) Yes (including specific mention of several international human rights instruments)…