Damages experts

Damages, Damages experts, Expert evidence, Experts, International Law Talk, Kluwer Podcast

(Law Offices of Kiran N Gore PLLC; The George Washington University Law School)/ /Leave a comment

International Law Talk is a series of podcasts through which Wolters Kluwer provides the latest news and industry insights from thought leaders and experts in the fields of International Arbitration, IP Law, International Tax Law, and Competition Law. Here at Kluwer Arbitration Blog, we highlight the podcasts focused on international arbitration. In this latest episode,…

Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Damages experts

(Berkeley Research Group)/ /1 Comment

I recently had a conversation with a friend who expressed his worries about the potential implications of artificial intelligence (“AI”), such as ChatGPT, on the future of human labor. He voiced particular concerns regarding the displacement of humans’ roles in business analytics, the field in which his expertise lies. ChatGPT is an AI-driven chatbot that…

Damages, Damages experts, M&A

(FTI Consulting) and (Baird Forensic)/ /Leave a comment

2021 was a record-breaking year for mergers and acquisitions (M&A). The total global deal value amounted to USD 5.9 trillion, an increase of 64% compared to 2020 and the highest ever recorded, driven by high valuations and fuelled by access to cheap financing. The market was strong across corporate and financial buyers. The year saw…

Arbitration Tech Toolbox, Damages, Damages experts, Hot tubbing, quantum

, (Berkeley Research Group)/ /Leave a comment

The views of the party-appointed experts in an arbitration may differ substantially, making it difficult for tribunals to navigate within the multiple areas of disagreement. Even if the disagreed issues can be isolated (e.g. via means of the joint expert report), understanding the sensitivity of the amount claimed to the individual assumptions may not be…

Counterclaims, Damages experts, Ecuador, Environment, Independent experts

(Herbert Smith Freehills) and (Herbert Smith Freehills )/ /Leave a comment

After 11 years and more than US$ 89 million in costs,1)Perenco claimed US$ 57,923,322 in legal costs and other expenses, while Ecuador claimed US$ 31,620,369.27 for legal costs and other expenses and an additional US$ 49,629.76 for Petroecuador’s legal costs (a total of US$ 31,701,618.76). an international tribunal rendered a final decision awarding damages in…

Damages, Damages experts, Investment Arbitration, Investor, Investor-State arbitration

(FTI Consulting)/ /1 Comment
ArbitralWomen

Recently published arbitral awards provide insight into Tribunals’ reasoning when the quantum of a claim is challenged for being too uncertain or speculative. Typically, Claimants will not only claim costs incurred up to the date of the breach or expropriation, but they will also claim compensation for future profits in a but-for scenario. However, a…

Arbitral Award, Argentina, BIT, Damages, Damages experts, Uncategorized

(Herbert Smith Freehills) and (AlixPartners LLP)/ /Leave a comment

On December 21, 2016, the Tribunal in Hochtief v Argentina issued an award on damages against Argentina in an arbitration brought under the Argentina-Germany BIT.  The Claimant had alleged multiple treaty breaches by Argentina, arising out of the 2000 economic crisis, and originally sought US$ 54 million in damages.  Although the Tribunal found that Argentina…

Damages, Damages experts, Interest rates, LIBOR

, (Charles River Associates)/ /Leave a comment

The selection of an interest rate to apply to an arbitral damages award can be an important determinant of the total award. For example, prejudgment interest added 26% to damages across 63 ICSID awards since 2000. Consistent with this notion, many international investment treaties specify claimants be compensated at a reasonable or normal “commercial rate.”…

Actual expenditure, Arbitration, Damages, Damages experts, Fair market value, Historic costs

(FTI Forensic and Litigation Consulting)/ /1 Comment

This is the third and final article in a three-part series summarising the main valuation methodologies used for the purposes of determining economic loss. In parts one and two, I provided an overview of the market-approach and income-based methodologies. I now conclude by reviewing the asset-based approach. To what extent, if any, is the sum…

Arbitration, Damages, Damages experts, Dispute Resolution, Fair market value

(FTI Forensic and Litigation Consulting)/ /2 Comments

This is the second article in a three-part series summarising the main valuation methodologies used for the purposes of determining economic loss. In part one, I provided an overview of the market-approach methodology. I now turn to the income-based approach, focusing on the discounted cash flow (DCF) methodology. In my previous article, I noted that…

Arbitration, Arbitration Awards, Damages, Damages experts, Fair market value, International arbitration

(FTI Forensic and Litigation Consulting)/ /3 Comments

A key part of an expert witness’s role involves explaining, in as clear terms as possible, complex accounting, economic and valuation concepts, to arbitration lawyers who may be less familiar with or even daunted by the world of finance. My suspicion is that expert witnesses could do much more to assist the arbitration community in…

Actual expenditure, Arbitration, Damages, Damages experts, Expert evidence

(FTI Forensic and Litigation Consulting)/ /Leave a comment

“…there are known knowns; these are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don’t know we don’t know” Former US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. One of…

Arbitration Proceedings, Damages experts, Third party funding

(FTI Forensic and Litigation Consulting)/ /Leave a comment

The controversial topic of third-party funding in international arbitration continues to generate much debate across the conference circuit and in the legal press. On the one hand, supporters claim that such third-party funding arrangements improve access to justice since they allow otherwise cash-poor claimants to pursue meritorious claims; on the other, detractors believe that third-party…