Investment protection

BIT, Foreign Investment Law, Human Rights, ICSID Arbitration, International arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, State Responsibility for Damage, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Treaty Interpretation, UK

/ /Leave a comment

A recent seminar delivered under the Chatham House Rule considered the usefulness of an analogy between Investment Treaty Arbitration (ITA) and domestic public law, with a view to critiquing perceived imbalances in the former. The content of the seminar was grounded in the speaker’s background in ITA and public law litigation including domestic judicial review…

BIT, Energy Charter Treaty, European Commission, European Law, European Union, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, ISDS

(NL-Investmentconsulting)/ /1 Comment

The Inaugural Conference of the European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA) took place on Friday, 23 January 2015, in the Senate House of the Queen Mary University of London. 160 participants ranging from academics, arbitrators, arbitration institutions, companies, lawyers to NGOs reviewed a full day long the EU’s first 5 years of European…

BIT, European Court of Human Rights, Investment, Investment protection, Investor, Lis Pendens

(Linklaters)/ /Leave a comment

Although a bilateral investment treaty (“BIT”) arbitration and an application made before the European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) could, at first glance, present opposite objectives, investors alleging a violation of their rights by a State may be inclined to make use of both remedies. As it will be elaborated below, the case law…

Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

(Baker Botts LLP)/ /Leave a comment

That was the assessment of Constantine Partasides QC, founding partner of Three Crowns, during his keynote address to the joint ITA-IEL conference. According to Mr. Partasides, there is a developing consensus among states that it is acceptable, and even virtuous, to challenge investor-state arbitration as an infringement on the rights of the public to pass…

Ad hoc arbitration, Annulment, Arbitral Award, Arbitral seat, Arbitration Awards, International arbitration, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Public Policy

(Mechantaf Law)/ /Leave a comment

In one of the very rare decisions issued by courts in the Arab world applying the provisions of the Unified Agreement for the Investment of Arab Capital in the Arab States (the “UAIAC”), the Cairo Court of Appeal has revived in its decision dated February 5, 2014, the principle of finality of arbitration awards, by…

ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law)/ /4 Comments

Paraphrasing Churchill, investment arbitration is the worst form of foreign investment dispute resolution, except for all the others. Post-Suez, governments are more civilised than to employ gunboat diplomacy for their own investors, and local courts are inherently partial. Achieving neutrality is the objective, and the only means: investment arbitration. This is the conventional wisdom for…

ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, International Court of Justice, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Treaty, Treaty Interpretation, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

/ /Leave a comment

One of the recurrent controversial issues in the investment arbitration practice relates to the application of the general rule of treaty interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in the interpretation of the provisions of the ICSID Convention and of investment treaties in general. Thomas Wälde in one of his last writings…

ICSID Arbitration, ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Moral Damages

(University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

Let’s get this straight: When awarded to persons, including foreign investors, moral damages are compensatory in nature. They are not discretionary. They are not symbolic. They are not exemplary. They are not punitive. Rather, as the commentary to the ILC Draft Articles 36 and 37 on State Responsibility notes, “[c]ompensable personal injury encompasses not only…

Australia, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(University of Sydney & Williams Trade Law)/ /Leave a comment

Indonesia is not the only Asia-Pacific nation that is reassessing investment treaties containing provisions on Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS, especially arbitration). India announced a review in 2013, partly in the wake of the successful claim from an Australian mining investor, although the impact in practice is hard to discern or predict – especially under the…

Exhaustion of Local Remedies, International Law, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, NAFTA

(University of Michigan Law School)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

In its Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, a unanimous tribunal in Apotex, Inc. v. United States dismissed a Canadian manufacturer’s claims that the United States judiciary had violated NAFTA by mis-applying a regulatory time period. Most of the reaction to Apotex has focused on the tribunal’s decision that the claimant’s activities in the United States—and…

ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Latin America

(Pinheiro Neto Advogados)/ /Leave a comment

Investment arbitration is a crucial and sensitive dispute-resolution method, notably because the treatment given to foreign investment matters may materially affect the economic and social realities of a country or region, particularly those in development. In the last decade, however, as already reported and addressed in this blog by, among many others, Vanessa Giraud and…

Arbitral Award, Arbitration Institutions and Rules, BIT, Enforcement, India, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection

/ /Leave a comment

and Sapna Jhangiani, Clyde & Co. and Joseph P. Matthews J.D., University of Miami School of Law for Young Arbitration Practitioners It has been some time since the White Industries Australia Limited v Republic of India judgment was rendered against India in 2011. However, there remain several interesting aspects of the case still not widely…

Annulment, ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /7 Comments

and Oleg Temnikov Foreword The recent decision on preliminary objections, dated 17 January 2014, against the application for annulment in Elsamex S.A. v. Honduras (ARB/09/4) brought renewed interest in the procedure for summary dismissal of unmeritorious claims under Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. The present post examines shortly this procedure as well as…

Arbitration Awards, BIT, Enforcement, ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Investment protection

(Baker Botts LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The keynote speaker at this year’s ITA Annual Workshop was the Honorable Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor. Judge Sepúlveda-Amor is Vice President of the International Court of Justice and a professor of international law at El Colegio de México. He has previously served on the United Nations International Law Commission, as Mexico’s Secretary of Foreign Affairs, and as…

Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Turkey

(Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP)/ /Leave a comment

Although Turkey has ratified the ICSID Convention as early as in 1988, it was not until the recent decade that its domestic law recognized the possibility to resort to arbitration against the State. Until 2000s, disputes arising between a public authority and a private party were to be resolved in an appeal to administrative courts…

ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Latin America

(D'Empaire Reyna, Abogados)/ /1 Comment

Over the years Latin American countries have played an increasingly relevant role in the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (the “ICSID”), with the highest proportion – 27% – of all cases handled by the Centre. Despite the high percentage these same countries have been increasingly expressing their dislike about having to resolve their…

Arbitration Proceedings, BIT, Foreign Investment Law, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Venezuela

(Linklaters)/ /Leave a comment
Linklaters

Apropos of a recent decision in ConocoPhillips v. Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/07/30), this post discusses the potential underlying concerns an arbitral tribunal may consider when deciding whether it can revise earlier decisions within the context of fragmented proceedings. Background The ICSID proceedings in ConocoPhillips v. Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/07/30) commenced in November 2007…

BIT, Expropriation, Fair and Equitable Treatment, Fair market value, ICSID Convention, International Court of Justice, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor, Permanent Court of International Justice

(International Moot Court Competition Association (IMCCA))/ /Leave a comment

and Oleg Temnikov I. Foreword At the end of 2013, the Financial Times reported that a referendum will be held in Berlin on the question whether the State shall take over power supply from the hands of Vattenfall. We use this as an occasion to examine the legal implications in the field of investment arbitration…

ICSID Convention, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

(Hogan Lovells)/ /Leave a comment
Hogan Lovells

By Carmen Núñez-Lagos and Javier García Olmedo In an award rendered on 31 January 2014, an arbitral tribunal constituted under the UNCITRAL Rules declined jurisdiction over the claims brought by one of two claimants against the Plurinational State of Bolivia on the basis of the application of a denial of benefits clause in the US-Bolivia…

BIT, ICSID Convention, Investment protection, Trans-Pacific Partnership

(Clyde & Co. LLP)/ /2 Comments
Clyde & Co.

By Beth Cubitt and Tom French The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) – a multi-lateral agreement proposed between a number of countries, currently including Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States and Vietnam (although it is hoped to be an open platform welcoming other countries to participate) – is currently the subject of…

Burden of proof, Corruption, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(Colibra Insurance)/ /Leave a comment

Factual background On 4 October 2013 the Tribunal constituted under Metal-Tech Ltd.’s claim against Republic of Uzbekistan (G. Kauffman-Kohler, C. von Wobeser, J. Townsend) issued the award on jurisdiction in the ICSID case ARB/10/03. The peculiar factual background of the case has been previously discussed here. The approach taken by the Tribunal in this case…

Consent, Corruption, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment agreements, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Israel

(University of Alberta Faculty of Law)/

On 4 October 2013, an ICSID tribunal rendered its decision in the investment treaty dispute between the Israeli company Metal-Tech Ltd. and Uzbekistan. In the award, the tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the parties’ claims and counterclaims brought under the Israel-Uzbekistan BIT and Uzbek law due to corruption related to Metal-Tech’s investment…

BIT, Europe, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection

(Perréard de Boccard)/ /Leave a comment

Last year at about the same period, I reported on two major events that had been taking place in the world of Intra- and Extra-EU BITs, the Regulation establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investments agreements between Member States and Third Countries, on the one hand, and the Electrabel decision, on the other. See blog of…

Arbitration, ICSID Convention, Investment, Investment Arbitration, Investment protection, Investor

(Ilyashev & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

The “contribution of assets” requirement of the Salini test was often overlooked by commentators and tribunals, probably due to its “I-know-it-when-I-see-it” nature. The recent award in KT Asia Investment Group B.V. v Republic of Kazakhstan, however, demonstrates that a failure to meet the contribution requirement may put to rest a claim of an offshore company…