Lis Pendens

BIT, European Court of Human Rights, Investment, Investment protection, Investor, Lis Pendens

(Linklaters)/ /Leave a comment

Although a bilateral investment treaty (“BIT”) arbitration and an application made before the European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) could, at first glance, present opposite objectives, investors alleging a violation of their rights by a State may be inclined to make use of both remedies. As it will be elaborated below, the case law…

Anti-suit injunction, Arbitral seat, Domestic Courts, EU Regulation 44/ 2001, European Union, Jurisdiction, Lis Pendens, New York Convention, Parallel Proceedings

(Loyola University Chicago School of Law)/ /1 Comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

One purpose for anti-suit injunctions is to stop parallel proceedings, that is, to stop parties from pursuing litigation or arbitration involving the same parties and the same claims in two different jurisdictions simultaneously. To stop parallel proceedings in arbitration, a party will go to the court at the seat of the arbitration and will ask…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, Jurisdiction, kompetenz-kompetenz, Lis Pendens, National Arbitration Laws, New York Convention, Public Policy, Seat of the arbitration, Set aside an international arbitral award

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

I am grateful to Professor Hess for his comments on my 3 March 2010 blog. It greatly contributes to advancing the debate. However, it also perfectly illustrates the difficulties of a proposition – the total or partial deletion of the arbitration exception in Regulation 44/2001 – that has not been sufficiently thought through. 1. Professor…

Arbitration Agreements, Arbitration Awards, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, Jurisdiction, Lis Pendens, National Arbitration Laws, New York Convention, Seat of the arbitration

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /Leave a comment

Professor Hess is the author of the chapter of the Heidelberg Report on the interplay between arbitration and the Regulation 44/2001 (“the Regulation”). As such, and quite understandably, he actively promotes the suggestion that the arbitration exception should be deleted from the Regulation. The Heidelberg proposal has been followed by a Green Paper of the…

Investment Arbitration, Lis Pendens, North America, Res Judicata, South America

(Notre Dame Law School)/ /2 Comments

My colleague Trey Childress has a nice summary of the recent decision by a federal court in Florida in Osorio v. Dole Food Company to refuse to enforce a $97 million Nicaraguan judgment. Here’s the key excerpt of the decision: “the evidence before the Court is that the judgment in this case did not arise…

Arbitration Agreements, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, European Law, Jurisdiction, Lis Pendens

(Fulbright & Jaworski LLP)/ /1 Comment
YIAG

In the recent decision in Youell v La Reunion Aerienne [2009] EWCA Civ 175 the English Court of Appeal applied the ECJ decision in West Tankers and upheld a Commercial Court decision holding that the mere fact that a contract contains an arbitration clause does not deprive the court of jurisdiction under the Brussels Regulation….

Arbitration Awards, Arbitration Proceedings, Arbitrators, Commercial Arbitration, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Europe, European Law, Legislation, Lis Pendens, Seat of the arbitration

(Castaldi Mourre & Partners)/ /1 Comment

The relationship between Arbitration and European Judicial Private Law has not always been easy. The bedrock European Law principle in this field, as embedded in the European Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 of December 22, 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (“the Judgment Regulation”), is the…