New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Arbitration, Insolvency, Lex Arbitri, Lex Fori, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Model Law

(King's College London)/ /Leave a comment

Since 2019, Working Group (“WG”) V of UNCITRAL has been working on the adoption of a choice of law instrument that regulates the law applicable to the international effects of insolvency proceedings. The project seeks to include a rule on the law governing the impact of insolvency in arbitration. Part I of this post examines…

Arbitration, Insolvency, Lex Arbitri, Lex Fori, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL, UNCITRAL Model Law

(King's College London)/ /Leave a comment

Building on Part I of this post, Part II explains the serious practical disfunctions that would derive from the adoption by Working Group V (“WG V”) at UNCITRAL of the current proposal to subject all the effects of insolvency in arbitration to the law of the State in which insolvency proceedings have been opened (the…

DIAC, DIFC, Enforceability, Enforcement, Enforcement of an arbitration clause, MENA, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UAE

(Blanke Arbitration LLC)/ /Leave a comment

In a recent ruling of 20 June 2024 (ARB 009/2024 Narcisco v. Nash), the Dubai International Financial Centre (“DIFC”) Court of First Instance (“DIFC CFI”) was asked, as part of a wider investigation to grant an anti-suit injunction, to consider the validity of an arbitration agreement that provided for arbitration under the DIFC-London Court of…

DIAC, Enforceability, Enforcement, Enforcement of arbitration agreement, MENA, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, United Arab Emirates

(Blanke Arbitration LLC)/ /1 Comment

Two recent judgments, one from the United States (US) District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (“Louisiana Court”) and another from the Singapore High Court (“Singapore Court”), have highlighted the difficulties that Decree No. 34/2021(Concerning the Dubai International Arbitration Centre) (“Decree No. 34/2021”) may cause to the enforceability of DIFC-LCIA arbitration clauses in arbitrations…

ArbitrateAD, Arbitration institution, DIAC, Dubai, Middle East, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Singapore, United Arab Emirates

, , (Al Tamimi & Company)/ /Leave a comment

In September 2021, the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) issued Decree No. 34 of 2021 (“Decree 34”) by which the DIFC Arbitration Institution, the administering body of the DIFC-LCIA arbitration centre (“DIFC-LCIA”) was abolished with immediate effect, and all its obligations, rights, and resources were assigned to the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). Decree 34 also…

Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Agreements, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL Model Law, Validity

(Law Offices of Kiran N Gore PLLC; The George Washington University Law School) and (Queen's University Faculty of Law)/ /Leave a comment

As experienced negotiators know, the process of contract negotiation can give rise to fruitful and long-lasting business relationships. The parties may meet several times to develop the precise terms of their agreements, through videoconferences, in conference rooms, or over dinner and drinks. But for many contracts, the parties’ representatives never meet, limiting their negotiations to…

Australia, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL, Working Group II

, (UNCITRAL National Coordination Committee for Australia)/ /Leave a comment

On Friday, 26 May 2023, the UNCITRAL National Coordination Committee for Australia (UNCCA) hosted its eighth annual May Seminar at the University of Canberra. This event, which took the form of a full-day conference, saw participants from all over Australia in the fields of government, private practice, and academia, spanning from students to eminent practitioners….

Dubai, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UAE

(Watson Farley & Williams (Middle East) LLP)/ /Leave a comment

The UAE acceded to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award 1958 (“NYC”) in 2006 by virtue of Federal Decree No. 43 of 2006. In recent years, the approach taken by the onshore UAE courts towards the enforcement and recognition of awards under the NYC, including the challenges of…

Bolivia, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Public Policy, United States Courts, USA

, , (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In an important decision upholding the finality of awards and party autonomy in international commercial arbitration, a divided three-member panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently held in Compañía de Inversiones Mercantiles SA v. Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV (58 F.4th 429 (10th Cir. 2023)) that recognition of…

Arbitration Agreement, Korea, Law governing the arbitration agreement, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Proper law of arbitration agreement

(Kim & Chang)/ /Leave a comment

The issue of the governing law of the arbitration agreement was brought into the spotlight with the U.K. Supreme Court decision in Enka v. Chubb (discussed on the Blog here and here), and it became a hotly debated topic following the conflicting decisions from French and English courts on Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v. Kout Food…

Fiji, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Pacific Islands, Palau, Recognition and enforcement of arbitral award, Tonga

(12 Wentworth Selborne Chambers)/ /1 Comment

Historical records indicate that Tuesday, 10 June 1958 must have been a busy day in the corridors of the United Nations.1)Gary Born and the author are Expert International Commercial Arbitration Consultants retained by the Asian Development Bank to advise states on accession to the Convention, legislative reform and capacity building. On that day, following the…

Cyprus, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Uncategorized

(Christos Georgiadis & Associates) and (University of Nicosia)/ /Leave a comment

Cyprus is a hub for international business transactions and tax structures. It is also a place where the assets of numerous multinational corporations and businesses are maintained. As such, it is a place which where the enforcement of international arbitration awards is frequently sought. In light of the above, one would expect Cyprus to be…

New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, United Arab Emirates

(Al Owais Advocates & Legal Consultants)/ /Leave a comment

The United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) adhered to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known as the New York Convention (“New York Convention”) in 2006. Joining the New York Convention was done through Federal Decree No. 43 of  2006. This post examines how the New York Convention has been implemented…

Enforceability, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Qatar

, (Al Tamimi & Company)/ /Leave a comment

Over the last few years, the courts in Qatar have been criticized from the arbitration community for having issued several rulings setting aside both domestic and foreign arbitral awards on public policy grounds. In particular, these rulings held that like court issued judgments, domestic and even foreign arbitral awards were required to be rendered in…

New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Null and void, United States, United States Courts, USA

(Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In CLMS Mgmt. Servs. et al. v. Amwins Brokerage et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether a state law (by operation of the federal McCarran-Ferguson Act, which gives states the authority to regulate the business of insurance) voiding arbitration agreements in insurance contracts reverse-preempted Article II, Section 3 of…

Hague Choice of Court Convention, Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, judicial review, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

(Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /2 Comments

In a series of recent posts (Part I, Part II and Part III), I argued that states should not ratify the Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention (“Convention”) and, if they had already done so, that they should denounce the Convention.  Two good friends, Trevor Hartley and João Ribeiro-Bidaoui, recently responded on Kluwer Arbitration Blog…

Hague Choice of Court Convention, Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, judicial review, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

(Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP)/ /Leave a comment

This post continues from Part I. Party Autonomy and Consent:  How the Convention Undermines Them My previous posts argued that the Convention undermines vital protections that existing law provides for party autonomy and genuine consent.  In response, Mr. Ribeiro argues that the Convention advances notions of party autonomy: it supposedly serves to “enable parties to…

Hague Choice of Court Convention, Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, judicial review, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

(Lauterpacht Centre for International Law in the University of Cambridge) and (The George Washington University Law School)/ /1 Comment

Gary Born, in a three-part series in Kluwer Arbitration Blog last month, addressed why States should not participate in the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice Of Court Agreements (“Hague Convention”). We assume that readers are familiar with Mr. Born’s posts (available as Part I, Part II, and Part III), and so we will confine ourselves to recalling this…

Applicable Law, Arbitration Agreement, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

(University of Miami School of Law)/ /Leave a comment

On 21 April 2021, the CIArb’s London Branch hosted its annual Keynote Speech, which was held online this year. In her speech on “The Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement”, Professor Dr. Maxi Scherer discussed the different approaches taken by jurisdictions worldwide in determining the law governing the arbitration agreement. She further compared those approaches…

COVID-19, Enforcement, Investment Arbitration, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Public Policy

(Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP/ Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)/ /Leave a comment
Young ICCA

Exceptional times call for exceptional measures. We have all been experiencing a global pandemic for almost a year now. In an era where the legal exception tends to become the mainstream rule, one is left to wonder how far can this reversal of odds go. Is the global public health crisis susceptible to calling into…

Common Law, England, English courts, Law governing the arbitration agreement, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Validation

(39 Essex Chambers)/ /Leave a comment

Much has been written about the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Enka v Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 (“Enka”) including on the blog. Those familiar with the judgment will know the Supreme Court decision was split 3 – 2 and the majority upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision but on different grounds. These divisions may give…

National Courts, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Pakistan

/ /1 Comment

The obligation of contracting states to recognize arbitration agreements and refer the parties to arbitration is provided in Article II of the New York Convention 1958 (the ‘Convention’). This post will endeavor to evaluate the meaning of the phrase ‘refer the parties to arbitration’ used in Article II(3) of the Convention and whether this phrase…

Annulment, Enforcement, Indonesia, Interim measures, New York Convention, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, UNCITRAL Model Law

(Asian International Arbitration Centre) and (KarimSyah Law Firm)/ /Leave a comment
Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC)

12th August 2020 marks the 21st anniversary of the Indonesia’s Law Number 30 Year 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“Arbitration Law”).1)Any comments/views expressed in this article are those of the authors only. They do not reflect the views of KarimSyah Law Firm or AIAC unless otherwise stated. Culture wise, many countries, especially Indonesia, venerate…

Arbitral Award, COVID-19, Enforcement, International arbitration, New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Public Policy, Recognition and enforcement of arbitral award, Virtual hearings

(American University of Armenia, ADR Clinic), (American University of Armenia, Technology and Innovation Legal Clinic), and (Equanimity Arbitration)/ /Leave a comment

The COVID-19 outbreak as of now affects 183 states and a number of territories. Out of 164 State signatories to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the “New York Convention”) only Marshall Islands, Tonga, Palau are not affected by the pandemic; all 153 state members to the ICSID Convention…