Parallel Proceedings

Abusive Claims, Estoppel, Parallel Proceedings, Set aside an arbitral award, Singapore, Stay of Proceedings

(HFW Singapore LLP) and (WongPartnership LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In the recent Singapore High Court (“Court”) case of DJA v DJB [2024] SGHCR 10 (“DJA v DJB”), the Court was tasked with determining the novel question of whether the general legal principles for an application for a case management stay apply when an applicant seeks a case management stay of its own application to…

Anti-arbitration Injunction, Commercial Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Parallel Proceedings

(Al Tamimi & Company) and (Paxus LLP)/ /Leave a comment

In November 2022, a contract-based arbitral tribunal issued an anti-arbitration injunction with the aim of enjoining parallel investment treaty proceedings between the parties. This post examines this injunction – which was ignored by the investment-treaty tribunal – and its implications.   Background In March 2020, Patel Engineering Limited (“PEL”), an Indian-incorporated infrastructure and construction service…

Cross-disclosure, Parallel Proceedings

, (P&A Law Offices)/ /Leave a comment

The recent Singapore Court of Appeal judgment in Republic of India v. Vedanta Resources PLC provides a relevant backdrop for revisiting the often-competing themes of confidentiality and consistency in investment arbitrations and their effect on cross-disclosure of evidence (witness statements or documentary exhibits) and pleadings in parallel arbitral proceedings over a common substantive issue-in-dispute. Cross-disclosure…

Climate change, Energy Charter Treaty, Germany, Investment Arbitration, Legitimate Expectations, Parallel Proceedings

(Herbert Smith Freehills)/ /Leave a comment

Swedish state-owned power energy company Vattenfall operated two nuclear power plants located in Brunsbüttel and Krümmel, Germany. Vattenfall owns a 50% interest in the Krümmel plant, and a 66.6% interest in the Brunsbüttel plant. In August 2011, against the backdrop of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan, the German Parliament amended the Act on the…

Anti-arbitration, Arbitration Act, Injunction, Malaysia, Parallel Proceedings, Stay of Proceedings, Third Party

(Baskaran)/ /Leave a comment

Introduction It is not uncommon for a party (or an alleged party) to an arbitration agreement to apply to the local courts for an injunction to restrain the arbitral proceedings. Such an anti-arbitration injunction is usually applied for on the grounds that the applicant is not in fact a party to the arbitration agreement and…

BIT, ICSID Arbitration, ICSID Convention, India, Jurisdiction, kompetenz-kompetenz, Parallel Proceedings

/ /Leave a comment
Young ICCA

A key issue that has assumed importance in BIT arbitrations today is the role of state courts vis-à-vis investment tribunals. Two aspects of this issue become particularly relevant when courts are faced with claims of vexatious BIT arbitrations: (i) the law applicable in the court’s supervisory capacity, and (ii) the extent to which courts can…

Arbitration, ITA, Parallel Proceedings

(Dechert)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

The 30th Annual ITA Workshop on Multiple Proceedings, Multiple Parties, and International Arbitration: What a Tangled Web We Weave, took place in Dallas, Texas on 20-22 June 2018.  Co-chairing were Erica Stein (Dechert), Jean-Christophe Honlet (Dentons), and Frédéric G. Sourgens (Washburn University).  The workshop, a lead event of the ITA, was dedicated to an in-depth…

Belt Road Initiative, Evidence, IBA Guidelines on Party Representation, IBA Rules of Evidence, ICCA Sydney 2018, Parallel Proceedings, Permanent Court of Arbitration

(King & Wood Mallesons)/ /Leave a comment
King & Wood Mallesons

In a much-anticipated session at ICCA Sydney Conference 2018 moderated by Mark Kantor, the panel: Joongi Kim, Yonsei Law School (Republic of Korea); Judith Levine, Permanent Court of Arbitration (Australia, Ireland); Natalie L. Reid, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (Jamaica), tackled the following four “hot topics” in international arbitration: 1. illegally obtained evidence; 2. the One…

Anti-arbitration, Anti-suit injunction, BIT, India, Parallel Proceedings

(AnchayilKumar) and (JSA, Advocates & Solicitors)/ /Leave a comment

The long-standing tax dispute between India and the Vodafone, also previously discussed in here,  recently entered new territory when India secured an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the continuation of one of two bilateral investment treaty (“BIT”) arbitration proceedings initiated against it by the Vodafone group. A judge of the Delhi High Court granted this injunction on…

Injunction, Interim measures, Parallel Proceedings

, (Hannes Snellman)/ /3 Comments
Finland Arbitration Institute (FAI)

One of the topics discussed by the panels at last week’s 20th Annual IBA Arbitration Day was parallel proceedings. We heard well-prepared and interesting presentations on many aspects of parallel proceedings such as confidentiality and the taking of evidence. As we all know, such parallel proceedings often also take the form of court proceedings initiated…

Admissibility, Arbitral Award, Domestic Courts, Enforcement, Germany, Interim Ruling on Jurisdiction, Parallel Proceedings, Set aside an arbitral award

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP) and , , (Herbert Smith Freehills)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

The situation that the Bundesgerichtshof was recently faced with in a case is not uncommon: whilst a state court still reviews an arbitral tribunal’s preliminary ruling on its competence, the arbitral tribunal delivers its final award on the merits. This raises one question: What are the implications for the pending challenge to jurisdiction? In previous…

Investment, Investment Arbitration, Parallel Proceedings

(University of Notre Dame)/ /Leave a comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

More recent generations of investment treaties tend to include explicit provisions requiring claimants in investor-State arbitrations to submit waivers that – depending on the actual terminology used in these waiver provisions – generally seek to bar them from submitting their claims to other forums, such as through litigation before domestic courts or parallel international proceedings….

Brussels Regulation, Domestic law, Enforcement, European Law, Parallel Proceedings

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

As has been discussed previously on this blog, the recast Brussels Regulation contains a number of important clarifications to the arbitration exception. Paragraph 3 of Recital 12 and Article 73(2) make it clear that the recast Regulation shall not affect the application of the New York Convention (the “Convention”). The recast Regulation should allow a…

Anti-suit injunction, Arbitration Agreements, Commercial Arbitration, Enforcement of an arbitration clause, Jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, Parallel Proceedings, Set aside an arbitral award, Switzerland, Uncategorized

(Editor in Chief, ASA Bulletin; LALIVE)/ /1 Comment

Arbitration proceedings sometimes spawn a host of parallel court proceedings.  It is not unheard for parties to seek to instrumentalise courts, sometimes with the complicity of the courts themselves, to escape the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal.  Such conduct may, however, expose parties to liability for breach of the arbitration agreement, as was confirmed by…

Anti-arbitration, Anti-suit injunction, Domestic law, Intellectual Property Rights, Parallel Proceedings

(Herbert Smith Freehills LLP)/ /Leave a comment
Herbert Smith Freehills

In a judgment dated 10 May 2013 (Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Genentech, Inc., Appeal No 2012-1454) the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the ‘CAFC’) affirmed a first-instance decision refusing the grant of an injunction preventing Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH (‘Sanofi’) from continuing to participate in an ICC arbitration where issues of infringement…

Anti-suit injunction, Arbitral seat, Domestic Courts, EU Regulation 44/ 2001, European Union, Jurisdiction, Lis Pendens, New York Convention, Parallel Proceedings

(Loyola University Chicago School of Law)/ /1 Comment
Institute for Transnational Arbitration (ITA)

One purpose for anti-suit injunctions is to stop parallel proceedings, that is, to stop parties from pursuing litigation or arbitration involving the same parties and the same claims in two different jurisdictions simultaneously. To stop parallel proceedings in arbitration, a party will go to the court at the seat of the arbitration and will ask…