…objections to the majority’s decision. Most importantly, it states that the Tribunal “faces two glaringly insuperable obstacles that prevent it from taking jurisdiction”. First, the investors’ security entitlements are not…

…amount with interest thereon and compensation for costs. The Russian Borrower turned to the Svea Court of Appeal and requested, inter alia, a declaration that the award was invalid on…

…addressing this concern by giving emergency arbitrators the power to require the applicant to provide “appropriate security” as a pre-condition for the granting of relief (e.g. Appendix V, Article 6(7)…

…proceedings create delays, inefficiencies, costs, and also the uncertainty that you may end up with conflicting decisions. That is what anti-suit injunctions are supposed to stop. Some recent European developments…

…The Tribunal held that the Claimants’ security entitlements in Argentinean bonds are investments for the purposes of Article 25, ICSID Convention and protected under the Argentina-Italy BIT. Another controversy arises…